[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/pat: fix x86_has_pat_wp()
- To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 12:21:00 +0200
- Cc: jbeulich@xxxxxxxx, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 27 May 2022 10:21:22 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Ping?
On 03.05.22 15:22, Juergen Gross wrote:
x86_has_pat_wp() is using a wrong test, as it relies on the normal
PAT configuration used by the kernel. In case the PAT MSR has been
setup by another entity (e.g. BIOS or Xen hypervisor) it might return
false even if the PAT configuration is allowing WP mappings.
Fixes: 1f6f655e01ad ("x86/mm: Add a x86_has_pat_wp() helper")
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
index d8cfce221275..71e182ebced3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ static uint8_t __pte2cachemode_tbl[8] = {
/* Check that the write-protect PAT entry is set for write-protect */
bool x86_has_pat_wp(void)
{
- return __pte2cachemode_tbl[_PAGE_CACHE_MODE_WP] == _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_WP;
+ return __pte2cachemode_tbl[__cachemode2pte_tbl[_PAGE_CACHE_MODE_WP]] ==
+ _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_WP;
}
enum page_cache_mode pgprot2cachemode(pgprot_t pgprot)
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|
