[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 05/30] misc/pvpanic: Convert regular spinlock into trylock on panic path
- To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 10:03:13 -0300
- Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bhe@xxxxxxxxxx, kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-remoteproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openipmi-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel-dev@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx, halves@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fabiomirmar@xxxxxxxxx, alejandro.j.jimenez@xxxxxxxxxx, andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, d.hatayama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx, feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hidehiro.kawai.ez@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, john.ogness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxx, mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx, stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx, vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@xxxxxxxxxx>, Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@xxxxxxxxxx>, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 17 May 2022 13:04:33 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 17/05/2022 07:58, Petr Mladek wrote:
> [...]
>> Thanks for the review Petr. Patch was already merged - my goal was to be
>> concise, i.e., a patch per driver / module, so the patch kinda fixes
>> whatever I think is wrong with the driver with regards panic handling.
>>
>> Do you think it worth to remove this patch from Greg's branch just to
>> split it in 2? Personally I think it's not worth, but opinions are welcome.
>
> No problem. It is not worth the effort.
>
OK, perfect!
Cheers,
Guilherme
|
