|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: p2m_set_entry duplicate calculation.
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022, Paran Lee wrote:
> It doesn't seem necessary to do that calculation of order shift again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paran Lee <p4ranlee@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/p2m.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
> index 1d1059f7d2..533afc830a 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
> @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ int p2m_set_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m,
> while ( nr )
> {
> unsigned long mask;
> - unsigned long order;
> + unsigned long order, pages;
>
> /*
> * Don't take into account the MFN when removing mapping (i.e
> @@ -1118,11 +1118,12 @@ int p2m_set_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m,
> if ( rc )
> break;
>
> - sgfn = gfn_add(sgfn, (1 << order));
> + pages = 1 << order;
> + sgfn = gfn_add(sgfn, pages);
> if ( !mfn_eq(smfn, INVALID_MFN) )
> - smfn = mfn_add(smfn, (1 << order));
> + smfn = mfn_add(smfn, pages);
>
> - nr -= (1 << order);
> + nr -= pages;
> }
>
> return rc;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |