[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/retpoline: rename retpoline Kconfig check to include GCC prefix


  • To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:59:52 +0100
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=UA/k/Mxh1ePla6moqwRTP2hCd5vGqy6eR507Pa1dsr4=; b=FuuPOpgZuw2SCd0QB93XbCrUxtVgKy7xuQMFpDNJkrGzPR4V0HhE+hfuuiCHVvCQa/6f+DDZ0F1HZSu53mX18ySPSXVyNVBAAupLqjHG5Xs1za9/p+XCjbJX78s9As5hyj4bQS+ic+xtT35YBf/9X36M2o0E/01zHtGebMnd1duDBopTQhUy03ElDDaL+5h05owviaTsTyIBAkCiDVKLE30Z04M2F6BHhZK/mewcnMMqTsZjEkq0snmLxN9NARmMeX2Y71cbND+MqDfoW64qidCnbeTms69ATEdK7+LXmsiNOBaoIpm127ht75v8o26v0+wBx+6Gz3EeK/iEbIt5WQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=R6O8ADVm8RSaGrbcycxBD7f+hOPB0B+4IElp4e9r8Md362Nnu1lPV4g4t6Qy5iBBygb/UUkTdyjrOBTxM8cxqENuaPzspAtNrM0Hode816Z36nsUPWrSNUgdfl416bAAt/8oOrylfKx1pVfU0icamMu7ghJmV6OPJoAU39UAW8pYW2ZnSpr9hRPTV0WK7NUDMBbfTSUzKXsZ6iOSUcuQts6BGpjkkb/M9dr37p7+8tYnlgVfhIiyMP7vrA0Wd72elDtEh24mrNGqIyX1s5h9+LJ/tRE0HYHkt+aN4QHKvsfJ5hMDERbaNDWGnVopTSf6nOFmbmhvvDgcFxf73z8tsQ==
  • Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:00:05 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 16.02.2022 17:21, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Current retpoline checks apply to GCC only, so make it obvious by
> prefixing the Kconfig option with GCC. Keep the previous option as a
> way to signal generic retpoline support regardless of the underlying
> compiler.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>  - Put def_bool before depend on.

Just for the record: A slightly shorter alternative would have been ...

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -32,9 +32,13 @@ config ARCH_DEFCONFIG
>       string
>       default "arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig"
>  
> -config INDIRECT_THUNK
> +config GCC_INDIRECT_THUNK
>       def_bool $(cc-option,-mindirect-branch-register)
>  
> +config INDIRECT_THUNK
> +     def_bool y
> +     depends on GCC_INDIRECT_THUNK

config INDIRECT_THUNK
        bool

config GCC_INDIRECT_THUNK
        def_bool $(cc-option,-mindirect-branch-register)
        select INDIRECT_THUNK

A more appropriate thing to use for "depends on" might have been
CC_IS_GCC. With the next patch in mind this would then avoid
potential confusion if e.g. Clang folks decided to (also) support
the gcc style command line options.

Jan




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.