|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH 1/1] xen/arm: introduce dummy iommu node for dom0
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> Currently no IOMMU properties are exposed to dom0, thus kernel by default
> assumes no protection and enables swiotlb-xen, which leads to costly and
> unnecessary buffers bouncing.
>
> To let kernel know which device is behing IOMMU and hence needs no swiotlb
> services we introduce dummy xen-iommu node in FDT and link protected device
> nodes to it, using here device tree iommu bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergiy Kibrik <Sergiy_Kibrik@xxxxxxxx>
Hi Sergiy,
Thanks for the patch, I like how simple it is. FYI the patch doesn't
apply cleanly to staging any longer, you might need to rebase it.
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> xen/include/asm-arm/kernel.h | 3 ++
> xen/include/public/device_tree_defs.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> index 6cfc772e66..951ca0a0cb 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> @@ -623,6 +623,12 @@ static int __init write_properties(struct domain *d,
> struct kernel_info *kinfo,
> }
> }
>
> + if ( iommu_node && kinfo->phandle_iommu && dt_device_is_protected(node) )
> + {
> + res = fdt_property_cell(kinfo->fdt, "iommus", kinfo->phandle_iommu);
> + if ( res )
> + return res;
> + }
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -948,6 +954,38 @@ static int __init make_cpus_node(const struct domain *d,
> void *fdt)
> return res;
> }
>
> +static int __init make_iommu_node(const struct domain *d,
> + const struct kernel_info *kinfo)
> +{
> + const char compat[] = "xen,iommu-el2-v1";
> + int res;
> +
> + if ( !kinfo->phandle_iommu )
> + return 0;
> +
> + dt_dprintk("Create iommu node\n");
> +
> + res = fdt_begin_node(kinfo->fdt, "xen-iommu");
> + if ( res )
> + return res;
> +
> + res = fdt_property(kinfo->fdt, "compatible", compat, sizeof(compat));
> + if ( res )
> + return res;
> +
> + res = fdt_property_cell(kinfo->fdt, "#iommu-cells", 0);
> + if ( res )
> + return res;
> +
> + res = fdt_property_cell(kinfo->fdt, "phandle", kinfo->phandle_iommu);
> +
> + res = fdt_end_node(kinfo->fdt);
> + if ( res )
> + return res;
> +
> + return res;
> +}
> +
> static int __init make_gic_node(const struct domain *d, void *fdt,
> const struct dt_device_node *node)
> {
> @@ -1584,6 +1622,10 @@ static int __init handle_node(struct domain *d, struct
> kernel_info *kinfo,
> if ( res )
> return res;
>
> + res = make_iommu_node(d, kinfo);
> + if ( res )
> + return res;
> +
> res = make_memory_node(d, kinfo->fdt, addrcells, sizecells,
> &kinfo->mem);
> if ( res )
> return res;
> @@ -2177,6 +2219,8 @@ static int __init prepare_dtb_hwdom(struct domain *d,
> struct kernel_info *kinfo)
> ASSERT(dt_host && (dt_host->sibling == NULL));
>
> kinfo->phandle_gic = dt_interrupt_controller->phandle;
> + if ( is_iommu_enabled(d) )
> + kinfo->phandle_iommu = GUEST_PHANDLE_IOMMU;
It doesn't look like we need to save GUEST_PHANDLE_IOMMU under kinfo.
GUEST_PHANDLE_IOMMU is static. Instead we can just:
if ( !is_iommu_enabled(d) )
return 0;
at the beginning of make_iommu_node. Same for write_properties, we can
just skip the kinfo->phandle_iommu check and use GUEST_PHANDLE_IOMMU in
fdt_property_cell.
> fdt = device_tree_flattened;
>
> new_size = fdt_totalsize(fdt) + DOM0_FDT_EXTRA_SIZE;
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/kernel.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/kernel.h
> index 874aa108a7..efe09cd1e0 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/kernel.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/kernel.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ struct kernel_info {
> /* GIC phandle */
> uint32_t phandle_gic;
>
> + /* dummy iommu phandle */
> + uint32_t phandle_iommu;
> +
> /* loader to use for this kernel */
> void (*load)(struct kernel_info *info);
> /* loader specific state */
> diff --git a/xen/include/public/device_tree_defs.h
> b/xen/include/public/device_tree_defs.h
> index 209d43de3f..df58944bd0 100644
> --- a/xen/include/public/device_tree_defs.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/device_tree_defs.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> * onwards. Reserve a high value for the GIC phandle.
> */
> #define GUEST_PHANDLE_GIC (65000)
> +#define GUEST_PHANDLE_IOMMU (GUEST_PHANDLE_GIC + 1)
>
> #define GUEST_ROOT_ADDRESS_CELLS 2
> #define GUEST_ROOT_SIZE_CELLS 2
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |