[PATCH 2/2] vpci: use named rangeset for BARs

[Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@xxxxxxxxx>]

From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>

Use a named range set instead of an anonymous one, but do not print it
while dumping range sets for a domain.

Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
---
 xen/drivers/vpci/header.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
index 40ff79c33f8f..82a3e50d6053 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
@@ -206,12 +206,16 @@ static void defer_map(struct domain *d, struct pci_dev 
*pdev,
 static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
 {
     struct vpci_header *header = &pdev->vpci->header;
-    struct rangeset *mem = rangeset_new(NULL, NULL, 0);
+    struct rangeset *mem;
+    char str[32];
     struct pci_dev *tmp, *dev = NULL;
     const struct vpci_msix *msix = pdev->vpci->msix;
     unsigned int i;
     int rc;
 
+    snprintf(str, sizeof(str), "%pp", &pdev->sbdf);
+    mem = rangeset_new(NULL, str, RANGESETF_no_print);
+
     if ( !mem )
         return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.25.1