[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 1/2] include/public: add possible status values to usbif.h
On 27.09.21 10:13, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.09.2021 17:04, Juergen Gross wrote:The interface definition of PV USB devices is lacking the specification of possible values of the status filed in a response. Those areNit: "field"? Yes, of course. negative errno values as used in Linux, so they might differ in other OS's. Specify them via appropriate defines.What if new errno values got used by the driver? Would we alter the public header every time? Or is the likelihood of further values ever getting used vanishingly small? In how far would it be possible to tie these to Xen's public/errno.h instead? Those are the current values returned by the backend. Other ones used internally in the backend should IMO tried to be mapped to the values defined in the interface specification. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> --- xen/include/public/io/usbif.h | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/xen/include/public/io/usbif.h b/xen/include/public/io/usbif.h index c6a58639d6..fbd6f953f8 100644 --- a/xen/include/public/io/usbif.h +++ b/xen/include/public/io/usbif.h @@ -221,6 +221,13 @@ struct usbif_urb_response { uint16_t id; /* request id */ uint16_t start_frame; /* start frame (ISO) */ int32_t status; /* status (non-ISO) */ +#define USBIF_STATUS_OK 0 +#define USBIF_STATUS_NODEV -19 +#define USBIF_STATUS_INVAL -22 +#define USBIF_STATUS_STALL -32 +#define USBIF_STATUS_IOERROR -71 +#define USBIF_STATUS_BABBLE -75 +#define USBIF_STATUS_SHUTDOWN -108Nit: While probably benign for all practical uses, these negative values nevertheless would better be parenthesized. Okay, fine with me. Juergen Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |