[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] xen-pciback: allow compiling on other archs than x86
On 24.09.21 08:46, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > On 23.09.21 23:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >>> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Xen-pciback driver was designed to be built for x86 only. But it >>> can also be used by other architectures, e.g. Arm. >>> Re-structure the driver in a way that it can be built for other >>> platforms as well. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Anastasiia Lukianenko <anastasiia_lukianenko@xxxxxxxx> >> The patch looks good to me. Only one thing: on ARM32 I get: > WE do not yet support Xen PCI passthrough for ARM32 >> drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c: In function ‘bar_init’: >> drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c:239:34: warning: right shift >> count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] >> bar->val = res[pos - 1].start >> 32; >> ^~ >> drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c:240:49: warning: right shift >> count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] >> bar->len_val = -resource_size(&res[pos - 1]) >> 32; >> >> >> resource_size_t is defined as phys_addr_t and it can be 32bit on arm32. >> >> >> One fix is to surround: >> >> if (pos && (res[pos - 1].flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64)) { >> bar->val = res[pos - 1].start >> 32; >> bar->len_val = -resource_size(&res[pos - 1]) >> 32; >> return bar; >> } >> >> with #ifdef PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT >> > This might not be correct. We are dealing here with a 64-bit BAR on a 32-bit > OS. > > I think that this can still be valid use-case if BAR64.hi == 0. So, not sure > > we can just skip it with ifdef. > > Instead, to be on the safe side, we can have: > > config XEN_PCIDEV_STUB > tristate "Xen PCI-device stub driver" > depends on PCI && ARM64 && XEN > e.g. only allow building the "stub" for ARM64 for now. Or... there are couple of places in the kernel where PCI deals with the 32 bit shift as: drivers/pci/setup-res.c:108: new = region.start >> 16 >> 16; drivers/pci/iov.c:949: new = region.start >> 16 >> 16; commit cf7bee5a0bf270a4eace0be39329d6ac0136cc47 Date: Sun Aug 7 13:49:59 *2005* +0400 [snip] Also make sure to write high bits - use "x >> 16 >> 16" (rather than the simpler ">> 32") to avoid warnings on 32-bit architectures where we're not going to have any high bits. This might not be(?) immediately correct in case of LPAE though, e.g. 64-bit BAR may tolerate 40-bit address in some use-cases?
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |