|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] x86/p2m-pt: fix p2m_flags_to_access()
On 02/09/2021 08:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The initial if() was inverted, invalidating all output from this
> function. Which in turn means the mirroring of P2M mappings into the
> IOMMU didn't always work as intended: Mappings may have got updated when
> there was no need to. There would not have been too few (un)mappings;
> what saves us is that alongside the flags comparison MFNs also get
> compared, with non-present entries always having an MFN of 0 or
> INVALID_MFN while present entries always have MFNs different from these
> two (0 in the table also meant to cover INVALID_MFN):
>
> OLD NEW
> P W access MFN P W access MFN
> 0 0 r 0 0 0 n 0
> 0 1 rw 0 0 1 n 0
> 1 0 n non-0 1 0 r non-0
> 1 1 n non-0 1 1 rw non-0
>
> present <-> non-present transitions are fine because the MFNs differ.
> present -> present transitions as well as non-present -> non-present
> ones are potentially causing too many map/unmap operations, but never
> too few, because in that case old (bogus) and new access differ.
>
> Fixes: d1bb6c97c31e ("IOMMU: also pass p2m_access_t to p2m_get_iommu_flags())
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m-pt.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m-pt.c
> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ int p2m_pt_handle_deferred_changes(uint6
> /* Reconstruct a fake p2m_access_t from stored PTE flags. */
> static p2m_access_t p2m_flags_to_access(unsigned int flags)
> {
> - if ( flags & _PAGE_PRESENT )
> + if ( !(flags & _PAGE_PRESENT) )
> return p2m_access_n;
>
> /* No need to look at _PAGE_NX for now. */
>
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |