Re: [PATCH v3 08/30] target/alpha: Restrict has_work() handler to sysemu and TCG

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 9/3/21 10:18 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 9/2/21 6:15 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Restrict has_work() to TCG sysemu.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   target/alpha/cpu.c | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/alpha/cpu.c b/target/alpha/cpu.c
>> index 93e16a2ffb4..32cf5a2ea9f 100644
>> --- a/target/alpha/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target/alpha/cpu.c
>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static void alpha_cpu_set_pc(CPUState *cs, vaddr value)
>>       cpu->env.pc = value;
>>   }
>>   +#if defined(CONFIG_TCG) && !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>>   static bool alpha_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs)
> 
> Drop CONFIG_TCG for alpha; it's always true.

What is the rational? "Old" architectures (with no active /
official hw development) are unlikely to add hardware
acceleration, so TCG is the single one possible? Thus no
need to clutter the code with obvious #ifdef'ry?

> Otherwise,
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> r~
>