[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/PV: properly set shadow allocation for Dom0

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
From: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 22:08:48 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 21:08:56 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

At 15:03 +0200 on 30 Aug (1630335824), Jan Beulich wrote:
> Leaving shadow setup just to the L1TF tasklet means running Dom0 on a
> minimally acceptable shadow memory pool, rather than what normally
> would be used (also, for example, for PVH). Populate the pool before
> triggering the tasklet, on a best effort basis (again like done for
> PVH).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH 0/4] x86/PVH: Dom0 building adjustments
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 4/4] x86/PV: properly set shadow allocation for Dom0
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: [xen-4.13-testing test] 164644: regressions - FAIL
Next by Date: RE: [XEN RFC PATCH 24/40] xen/arm: introduce a helper to parse device tree NUMA distance map
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/PV: properly set shadow allocation for Dom0
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/PVH: Dom0 building adjustments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.