[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL"): > Looks like this didn't sort itself (yet). Do you continue to be > convinced that it will, eventually? Indeed not. The error message is different now. The guest installer reports 2021-08-18 18:14:09 Z 172.16.146.47:58906 <12>Aug 18 18:14:09 choose-mirror[2883]: WARNING **: broken mirror: invalid Suite in Release file for jessie which is bizarre. I didn't realise this test was using jessie, which is ancient. These tests seem to be hardcoded to use jessie. I'm going through the git history to see if I (or someone else) wrote anything which might explai. I suspect this might be obsolete pvgrub1. > Additionally I'm puzzled by these having been in the "are not > blocking" section up to flight 164202, and have since been in the > "are blocking" one. Probably, the Debian mirrors changed to drop jessie. Ian.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |