[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH V4 07/10] xen: re-define assign_pages and introduce assign_page
Hi Penny, On 28/07/2021 11:27, Penny Zheng wrote: In order to deal with the trouble of count-to-order conversion when page number is not in a power-of-two, this commit re-define assign_pages for nr pages and assign_page for original page with a single order. Backporting confusion could be helped by altering the order of assign_page parameters, such that the compiler would point out that adjustments at call sites are needed. Looking at the code, you don't alter the order of assign_page() parameters. So did you mean to refer to "assign_pages()"? Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@xxxxxxx> --- v4 change: - in all cases where order-0 pages get passed, prefer using assign_pages to pass literal 1 - reconstruct the order of assign_pages parameters - remove the unnecessary parentheses --- xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c | 2 +- xen/common/grant_table.c | 2 +- xen/common/memory.c | 4 ++-- xen/common/page_alloc.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- xen/include/xen/mm.h | 6 ++++++ 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c index af47615b22..9142f359da 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ int __init dom0_construct_pv(struct domain *d, else { while ( count-- ) - if ( assign_pages(d, mfn_to_page(_mfn(mfn++)), 0, 0) ) + if ( assign_pages(mfn_to_page(_mfn(mfn++)), 1, d, 0) ) BUG(); } initrd->mod_end = 0; diff --git a/xen/common/grant_table.c b/xen/common/grant_table.c index fab77ab9cc..1f6b89bff4 100644 --- a/xen/common/grant_table.c +++ b/xen/common/grant_table.c @@ -2342,7 +2342,7 @@ gnttab_transfer( * is respected and speculative execution is blocked accordingly */ if ( unlikely(!evaluate_nospec(okay)) || - unlikely(assign_pages(e, page, 0, MEMF_no_refcount)) ) + unlikely(assign_pages(page, 1, e, MEMF_no_refcount)) ) { bool drop_dom_ref;diff --git a/xen/common/memory.c b/xen/common/memory.cindex e07bd9a5ea..083e14b84f 100644 --- a/xen/common/memory.c +++ b/xen/common/memory.c @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static long memory_exchange(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_memory_exchange_t) arg) /* Assign each output page to the domain. */ for ( j = 0; (page = page_list_remove_head(&out_chunk_list)); ++j ) { - if ( assign_pages(d, page, exch.out.extent_order, + if ( assign_page(d, page, exch.out.extent_order, MEMF_no_refcount) ) { unsigned long dec_count; @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ static long memory_exchange(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_memory_exchange_t) arg) * cleared PGC_allocated. */ while ( (page = page_list_remove_head(&in_chunk_list)) ) - if ( assign_pages(d, page, 0, MEMF_no_refcount) ) + if ( assign_pages(page, 1, d, MEMF_no_refcount) ) { BUG_ON(!d->is_dying); free_domheap_page(page); diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c index f51e406401..e279c6f713 100644 --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c @@ -2282,9 +2282,9 @@ void init_domheap_pages(paddr_t ps, paddr_t pe)int assign_pages(- struct domain *d, struct page_info *pg, - unsigned int order, + unsigned long nr, + struct domain *d, unsigned int memflags) { int rc = 0; @@ -2304,7 +2304,7 @@ int assign_pages( { unsigned int extra_pages = 0;- for ( i = 0; i < (1ul << order); i++ )+ for ( i = 0; i < nr; i++ ) { ASSERT(!(pg[i].count_info & ~PGC_extra)); if ( pg[i].count_info & PGC_extra ) @@ -2313,18 +2313,18 @@ int assign_pages(ASSERT(!extra_pages ||((memflags & MEMF_no_refcount) && - extra_pages == 1u << order)); + extra_pages == nr)); } #endifif ( pg[0].count_info & PGC_extra ){ - d->extra_pages += 1u << order; + d->extra_pages += nr; memflags &= ~MEMF_no_refcount; } else if ( !(memflags & MEMF_no_refcount) ) { - unsigned int tot_pages = domain_tot_pages(d) + (1 << order); + unsigned int tot_pages = domain_tot_pages(d) + nr;if ( unlikely(tot_pages > d->max_pages) ){ @@ -2336,10 +2336,10 @@ int assign_pages( }if ( !(memflags & MEMF_no_refcount) &&- unlikely(domain_adjust_tot_pages(d, 1 << order) == (1 << order)) ) + unlikely(domain_adjust_tot_pages(d, nr) == nr) ) get_knownalive_domain(d);- for ( i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++ )+ for ( i = 0; i < nr; i++ ) { ASSERT(page_get_owner(&pg[i]) == NULL); page_set_owner(&pg[i], d); @@ -2354,6 +2354,11 @@ int assign_pages( return rc; }+int assign_page(struct domain *d, struct page_info *pg, unsigned int order,+ unsigned int memflags) +{ + return assign_pages(pg, 1UL << order, d, memflags); +}struct page_info *alloc_domheap_pages(struct domain *d, unsigned int order, unsigned int memflags) @@ -2396,7 +2401,7 @@ struct page_info *alloc_domheap_pages( pg[i].count_info = PGC_extra; } } - if ( assign_pages(d, pg, order, memflags) ) + if ( assign_page(d, pg, order, memflags) ) { free_heap_pages(pg, order, memflags & MEMF_no_scrub); return NULL; diff --git a/xen/include/xen/mm.h b/xen/include/xen/mm.h index 8e8fb5a615..2e75cdcbb7 100644 --- a/xen/include/xen/mm.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/mm.h @@ -132,6 +132,12 @@ int query_page_offline(mfn_t mfn, uint32_t *status); void heap_init_late(void);int assign_pages(+ struct page_info *pg, + unsigned long nr, + struct domain *d, + unsigned int memflags); + +int assign_page( struct domain *d, struct page_info *pg, unsigned int order, I find a bit odd that the parameters are ordered differently between assign_pages() and assign_page(). They are similar interface after all. I don't think it would be a problem for backporting purpose if assign_page() has a different order for the arguments. Jan, what do you think? Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |