[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH V3 05/10] xen/arm: static memory initialization
On 15.07.2021 07:18, Penny Zheng wrote: > v3 change: > - include addition of CONFIG_STATIC_ALLOCATION in this commit, where it > is firstly used and also change the name to CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY > - Fix TAB typo in Kconfig Not sure what this relates to, but ... > --- a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig > @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ config TEE > > source "arch/arm/tee/Kconfig" > > +config STATIC_MEMORY > + def_bool y ... this is (wrongly) using spaces for indentation. I also wonder about the placement: Shouldn't the option live in common code, with Arm "select"ing it? > --- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c > @@ -622,6 +622,28 @@ static void __init init_pdx(void) > } > } > > +/* Static memory initialization */ > +static void __init init_staticmem_pages(void) > +{ > + unsigned int bank; > + > + /* TODO: Considering NUMA-support scenario. */ > + for ( bank = 0 ; bank < bootinfo.static_mem.nr_banks; bank++ ) > + { > + paddr_t bank_start = bootinfo.static_mem.bank[bank].start; > + paddr_t bank_size = bootinfo.static_mem.bank[bank].size; > + paddr_t bank_end = bank_start + bank_size; > + > + bank_start = round_pgup(bank_start); > + bank_end = round_pgdown(bank_end); > + if ( bank_end <= bank_start ) > + return; > + > + free_staticmem_pages(maddr_to_page(bank_start), > + (bank_end - bank_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT, false); Indentation (one too few spaces). Perhaps also consider to avoid open-coding PFN_DOWN() here; in fact it and PFN_UP() could be used in place of round_pg{down,up}() above. Jan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |