[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] xen/arm64: Remove READ/WRITE_SYSREG32 helper macros





On 12/07/2021 07:26, Michal Orzel wrote:
Hi Julien,

Hi Michal,

On 09.07.2021 17:21, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Michal,

On 09/07/2021 13:40, Michal Orzel wrote:
AArch64 system registers are 64bit whereas AArch32 ones
are 32bit or 64bit. MSR/MRS are expecting 64bit values thus
we should get rid of helpers READ/WRITE_SYSREG32
in favour of using READ/WRITE_SYSREG.

The last place in code making use of READ/WRITE_SYSREG32
on arm64 is in TVM_REG macro defining functions vreg_emulate_<register>.
Implement a macro WRITE_SYSREG_SZ which expands as follows:
-on arm64: WRITE_SYSREG
-on arm32: WRITE_SYSREG{32/64}

As there are no other places in the code using these helpers
on arm64 - remove them.

Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v1:
-implement WRITE_SYSREG_SZ instead of duplicating the TVM_REG
---
   xen/arch/arm/vcpreg.c               | 12 +++++++++++-
   xen/include/asm-arm/arm64/sysregs.h |  4 ----
   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vcpreg.c b/xen/arch/arm/vcpreg.c
index f0cdcc8a54..10c4846954 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vcpreg.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vcpreg.c
@@ -47,6 +47,16 @@
    *
    */
   +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
+#define WRITE_SYSREG_SZ(sz, val, sysreg)     WRITE_SYSREG(val, sysreg)

I think you want to cast to (uint##sz##_t) to avoid any surprise. I think...

But the val will always be of type uint##sz##_t because it is passed from ...
+#else
+/*
+ * WRITE_SYSREG{32/64} on arm32 is defined as variadic macro which imposes
+ * on the below macro to be defined like that as well.
+ */
+#define WRITE_SYSREG_SZ(sz, val, sysreg...)  WRITE_SYSREG##sz(val, sysreg)
+#endif
+
   /* The name is passed from the upper macro to workaround macro expansion. */
   #define TVM_REG(sz, func, reg...)                                           \
   static bool func(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint##sz##_t *r, bool read)    \
@@ -55,7 +65,7 @@ static bool func(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint##sz##_t *r, bool 
read)    \
... here(*r argument).
So I do not think that such casting makes sense e.g
uint##sz##_t foo;
WRITE_SYSREG((uint##sz##_t)foo, bar);

I agree that this doesn't make sense for the *current* use. However, when writing code, we need to think how one could use it in the future...

When I read the name, I would expect that if I call it with sz == 32, then bottom 32-bit value to be written and the top 32-bit zeroed. But this is not the case...

You are relying on the developper and reviewer to notice that only 32-bit value should be passed when sz == 32.

I am not particularly keen on relying on this when a simple cast could prevent any future misuse. Alternatively, I would be happy to consider checking the type of the value at build time.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.