|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 08/10] xen/arm: introduce reserved_page_list
On 18.05.2021 07:21, Penny Zheng wrote:
> Since page_list under struct domain refers to linked pages as gueast RAM
> allocated from heap, it should not include reserved pages of static memory.
>
> The number of PGC_reserved pages assigned to a domain is tracked in
> a new 'reserved_pages' counter. Also introduce a new reserved_page_list
> to link pages of static memory. Let page_to_list return reserved_page_list,
> when flag is PGC_reserved.
>
> Later, when domain get destroyed or restarted, those new values will help
> relinquish memory to proper place, not been given back to heap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/common/domain.c | 1 +
> xen/common/page_alloc.c | 7 +++++--
> xen/include/xen/sched.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This contradicts the title's prefix: There's no Arm-specific change
here at all. But imo the title is correct, and the changes should
be Arm-specific. There's no point having struct domain fields on
e.g. x86 which aren't used there at all.
> --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2410,7 +2410,7 @@ int assign_pages(
>
> for ( i = 0; i < nr_pfns; i++ )
> {
> - ASSERT(!(pg[i].count_info & ~PGC_extra));
> + ASSERT(!(pg[i].count_info & ~(PGC_extra | PGC_reserved)));
> if ( pg[i].count_info & PGC_extra )
> extra_pages++;
> }
> @@ -2439,6 +2439,9 @@ int assign_pages(
> }
> }
>
> + if ( pg[0].count_info & PGC_reserved )
> + d->reserved_pages += nr_pfns;
I guess this again will fail to build on x86.
> @@ -588,6 +590,9 @@ static inline struct page_list_head *page_to_list(
> if ( pg->count_info & PGC_extra )
> return &d->extra_page_list;
>
> + if ( pg->count_info & PGC_reserved )
> + return &d->reserved_page_list;
Same here.
Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |