[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: do not set SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE when swiotlb is required
On 12.05.21 22:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Although SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE is meant to allow later calls to swiotlb_init,
today dma_direct_map_page returns error if SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE.
For now, without a larger overhaul of SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE, the best we can
do is to avoid setting SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE in mem_init when we know that it
is going to be required later (e.g. Xen requires it).
CC: boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx
CC: jgross@xxxxxxxx
CC: catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx
CC: will@xxxxxxxxxx
CC: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 2726bf3ff252 ("swiotlb: Make SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE perform no allocation")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
Juergen
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|
