[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/xen/entry: Rename xenpv_exc_nmi to noist_exc_nmi
- To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:15:51 +0200
- Authentication-results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx>, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@xxxxxxxxxx>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>, Jian Cai <caij2003@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 07:15:59 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 28/04/21 23:27, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:09:46 +0800
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
There is no any functionality change intended. Just rename it and
move it to arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c so that we can resue it later in
next patch for early NMI and kvm.
Nit, but in change logs, please avoid stating "next patch" as searching git
history (via git blame or whatever) there is no such thing as "next patch".
Interesting, I use next patch(es) relatively often, though you're right
that something like "in preparation for" works just as well. Yes, it's
the previous in "git log", but you get what it's meant in practice. :)
Paolo
Just state: "so that we can reuse it for early NMI and KVM."
I also just noticed the typo in "resue". Or maybe both NMI and KVM should
be sued again ;-)
-- Steve
|
