Re: [RFC PATCH] iommu: make no-quarantine mean no-quarantine

[Scott Davis <scott.davis@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/28/21, 3:20 AM, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> Following the extension to the command line option I'm putting in place
>> in "IOMMU: make DMA containment of quarantined devices optional" (which
>> I still need to get around to address review feedback for and resubmit),
>> I'd be inclined to suggest "iommu=quarantine=always" or
>> "iommu=quarantine=on-assign". Unless of course we'd prefer to have the
>> caller of the assignment operation have full control over the behavior
>> here anyway (in which case a command line option control simply is not
>> necessary).
>
> I'm still not entirely sure why not quarantining on is a problem, other
> than it triggering an as-yet undiagnosed issue in QEMU, but I agree that
> that the expectation of 'no-quarantine' meaning just that (i.e. the old
> dom0->domU and domU->dom0 transitions are re-instated) is reasonable. Do
> we really want yet more command line options?

Regarding the problem in QEMU, I traced the crash trigger down to a
write to the IQ tail register during the mapping operation into dom_io
(backtrace below). Along the way I noticed that, since a non-present
entry was being flushed, flush_context_qi only performs this
invalidation on an IOMMU with caching mode enabled (i.e. a software
IOMMU). Therefore this issue is probably only hittable when nesting.
Disabling caching mode on the QEMU vIOMMU was enough to prevent the
crash and give me a working system.

(gdb) si
0xffff82d04025b68b  72  in qinval.c
   0xffff82d04025b687 <qinval_update_qtail+43>: ... shl    $0x4,%r12
=> 0xffff82d04025b68b <qinval_update_qtail+47>: ... mov    %r12,0x88(%rax)
(gdb) bt
#0  0xffff82d04025b68b in qinval_update_qtail (...) at qinval.c:72
#1  0xffff82d04025baa7 in queue_invalidate_context_sync (...) at qinval.c:101
#2  flush_context_qi (...) at qinval.c:341
#3  0xffff82d040259125 in iommu_flush_context_device (...) at iommu.c:400
#4  domain_context_mapping_one (...) at iommu.c:1436
#5  0xffff82d040259351 in domain_context_mapping (...) at iommu.c:1510
#6  0xffff82d040259d20 in reassign_device_ownership (...) at iommu.c:2412
#7  0xffff82d040259f19 in intel_iommu_assign_device (...) at iommu.c:2476
#8  0xffff82d040267154 in assign_device (...) at pci.c:1545
#9  iommu_do_pci_domctl (...) at pci.c:1732
#10 0xffff82d040264de3 in iommu_do_domctl (...) at iommu.c:539
#11 0xffff82d040322ca5 in arch_do_domctl (...) at domctl.c:1496
#12 0xffff82d040205a19 in do_domctl (...) at domctl.c:956
#13 0xffff82d040319476 in pv_hypercall (...) at hypercall.c:155
#14 0xffff82d040390432 in lstar_enter () at entry.S:271
#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

As a result of the above, I no longer have a need to patch Xen to work
around the problem. Though I do want to test against newer versions of
QEMU (currently on 4.2.1) to see if it still exists.

So unless there's interest among Xen developers for this patch, I will
probably shelve it for now. Especially since it looks like Jan has some
ongoing work in this area that I had not previously discovered. If there
is interest, I just need a resolution on whether iommu=quarantine should
be left as a boolean or expanded to support always, never,
deassign-only, and (why not) assign-only.

Thanks,
Scott