Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/intel: insert Ice Lake-SP and Ice Lake-D model numbers

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 14.04.2021 06:40, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> LBR, C-state MSRs should correspond to Ice Lake desktop according to
> SDM rev. 74 for both models.
> 
> Ice Lake-SP is known to expose IF_PSCHANGE_MC_NO in IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR
> (as advisory tells and Whitley SDP confirms) which means the erratum is fixed
> in hardware for that model and therefore it shouldn't be present in
> has_if_pschange_mc list. Provisionally assume the same to be the case
> for Ice Lake-D while advisory is not yet updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>