[PATCH 00/11] assorted replacement of x[mz]alloc_bytes()

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

In the long run I think we want to do away with these type-unsafe
interfaces, the more that they also request (typically) excess
alignment. This series of entirely independent patches is
eliminating the instances where it's relatively clear that they're
not just "blob" allocations.

01: x86/HVM: avoid effectively open-coding xzalloc_flex_struct()
02: x86/vPMU: avoid effectively open-coding xzalloc_flex_struct()
03: x86/MCE: avoid effectively open-coding xmalloc_array()
04: x86/HVM: avoid effectively open-coding xmalloc_array()
05: x86/oprofile: avoid effectively open-coding xmalloc_array()
06: x86/IRQ: avoid over-alignment in alloc_pirq_struct()
07: EFI/runtime: avoid effectively open-coding xmalloc_array()
08: hypfs: avoid effectively open-coding xzalloc_array()
09: kexec: avoid effectively open-coding xzalloc_flex_struct()
10: video/lfb: avoid effectively open-coding xzalloc_array()
11: Arm/optee: don't open-code xzalloc_flex_struct()

Jan