[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH] x86/vpt: Replace per-guest pt_migrate lock with per pt lock


  • To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:56:35 -0400
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=oracle.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mCJL1UVF0uGsPx6r2QxWvx1KIL6nSvrVsNJD9J0kgL4=; b=coZPl+Hub/krc56SHRvnaHawYf49m5LLTkPADhT9P+PZRAKyxzgGvPgfmGZQE63Isk0triH7Nz361S3+H5AD5tAR8VsY11gb6cdc7L0M9uOhww/RzXwcHBhd2a8IsYpZtalgSrTlwsvxEFSFNANcOgAef6L2UUKMNMKR5U5Lfv0CosUbgwAqeYw6dGTp/UGh9N37ozZ7dFz5rxMNigCqCyp3unno714Bkynp8tXFbof9EntnmaDSyPlJSgWpTmB+gEVpS8ZI0JskY9JscK6/587CLKtVkVfi73hZX8sOqdSVo5GjgN2lRqf3tx5SVYERueRtOKEJbTOu/j90eksphg==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=n3zVHzcaJg/uWzhuuTpWZBDmQiI7sBm/b1ZdHKHVnZImTXIpcA6IDR63GN0Lh4vHGyhRDuXgvabvxoQZZU+gq4STdhBmXbwj9tmp/h/K99rWh+H7ReMK/2CdGGDxXltNIsk1TSV6yoWCtPwAYtbbsM4U8sM4fvLFQnm56jTC1T7KHfw9aM/wpJ76I+ADu+Y4F+TwZlql6mpf/Dc1SdkoYwZeTo7MKokckbGn5/FPURYrgdzgm7Oi60rAYDwWCVnb4lXF7IH20PDXeVH8PWpu5f3LSEzT3ehrV/RNrYfKpTxuTWiHlxUEbPkh6Q2k93JJki84e9sFET9V0R232wA4Ag==
  • Authentication-results: lists.xenproject.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.xenproject.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=oracle.com;
  • Cc: jbeulich@xxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, wl@xxxxxxx, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 20:57:18 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

Commit 8e76aef72820 ("x86/vpt: fix race when migrating timers between
vCPUs") addressed XSA-336 by introducing a per-domain rwlock that was
intended to protect periodic timer during VCPU migration. Since such
migration is an infrequent event no performance impact was expected.

Unfortunately this turned out not to be the case: on a fairly large
guest (92 VCPUs) we've observed as much as 40% TPCC performance regression
with some guest kernels. Further investigation pointed to pt_migrate
read lock taken in pt_update_irq() as the largest contributor to this
regression. With large number of VCPUs and large number of VMEXITs
(from where pt_update_irq() is always called) the update of an atomic in
read_lock() is thought to be the main cause.

Stephen Brennan examined the locking pattern and suggested using a
per-timer lock instead. This lock will need to be held whenever there is
a chance that pt->vcpu field may change (thus avoiding XSA-336
condition).

Suggested-by: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 xen/arch/x86/emul-i8254.c     |   2 +
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c       |   1 +
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c        |   2 -
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/rtc.c        |   1 +
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c     |   1 +
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpt.c        | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpt.h |   9 +---
 7 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/emul-i8254.c b/xen/arch/x86/emul-i8254.c
index 73be4188ad41..d83e727ff35e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/emul-i8254.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/emul-i8254.c
@@ -478,6 +478,8 @@ void pit_init(struct domain *d, unsigned long cpu_khz)
     if ( !has_vpit(d) )
         return;
 
+    spin_lock_init(&pit->pt0.lock);
+
     spin_lock_init(&pit->lock);
 
     if ( is_hvm_domain(d) )
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c
index ca94e8b4538c..c7f45412164e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c
@@ -734,6 +734,7 @@ static void hpet_set(HPETState *h)
         h->hpet.timers[i].cmp = ~0ULL;
         h->hpet.comparator64[i] = ~0ULL;
         h->pt[i].source = PTSRC_isa;
+        spin_lock_init(&h->pt[i].lock);
     }
 }
 
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
index e7bcffebc490..b60549a12a33 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
@@ -658,8 +658,6 @@ int hvm_domain_initialise(struct domain *d)
     /* need link to containing domain */
     d->arch.hvm.pl_time->domain = d;
 
-    rwlock_init(&d->arch.hvm.pl_time->pt_migrate);
-
     /* Set the default IO Bitmap. */
     if ( is_hardware_domain(d) )
     {
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/rtc.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/rtc.c
index 3150f5f1479b..6289d972bb67 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/rtc.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/rtc.c
@@ -842,6 +842,7 @@ void rtc_init(struct domain *d)
     }
 
     spin_lock_init(&s->lock);
+    spin_lock_init(&s->pt.lock);
 
     init_timer(&s->update_timer, rtc_update_timer, s, smp_processor_id());
     init_timer(&s->update_timer2, rtc_update_timer2, s, smp_processor_id());
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
index 5e21fb4937d9..8413e41a7a80 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
@@ -1626,6 +1626,7 @@ int vlapic_init(struct vcpu *v)
     vlapic_reset(vlapic);
 
     spin_lock_init(&vlapic->esr_lock);
+    spin_lock_init(&vlapic->pt.lock);
 
     tasklet_init(&vlapic->init_sipi.tasklet, vlapic_init_sipi_action, v);
 
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpt.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpt.c
index 4c2afe2e9154..36d4699a5de6 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpt.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpt.c
@@ -153,32 +153,16 @@ static int pt_irq_masked(struct periodic_time *pt)
     return 1;
 }
 
-static void pt_vcpu_lock(struct vcpu *v)
-{
-    read_lock(&v->domain->arch.hvm.pl_time->pt_migrate);
-    spin_lock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
-}
-
-static void pt_vcpu_unlock(struct vcpu *v)
-{
-    spin_unlock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
-    read_unlock(&v->domain->arch.hvm.pl_time->pt_migrate);
-}
-
 static void pt_lock(struct periodic_time *pt)
 {
-    /*
-     * We cannot use pt_vcpu_lock here, because we need to acquire the
-     * per-domain lock first and then (re-)fetch the value of pt->vcpu, or
-     * else we might be using a stale value of pt->vcpu.
-     */
-    read_lock(&pt->vcpu->domain->arch.hvm.pl_time->pt_migrate);
+    spin_lock(&pt->lock);
     spin_lock(&pt->vcpu->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
 }
 
 static void pt_unlock(struct periodic_time *pt)
 {
-    pt_vcpu_unlock(pt->vcpu);
+    spin_unlock(&pt->vcpu->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
+    spin_unlock(&pt->lock);
 }
 
 static void pt_process_missed_ticks(struct periodic_time *pt)
@@ -228,7 +212,7 @@ void pt_save_timer(struct vcpu *v)
     if ( v->pause_flags & VPF_blocked )
         return;
 
-    pt_vcpu_lock(v);
+    spin_lock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
 
     list_for_each_entry ( pt, head, list )
         if ( !pt->do_not_freeze )
@@ -236,7 +220,7 @@ void pt_save_timer(struct vcpu *v)
 
     pt_freeze_time(v);
 
-    pt_vcpu_unlock(v);
+    spin_unlock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
 }
 
 void pt_restore_timer(struct vcpu *v)
@@ -244,7 +228,7 @@ void pt_restore_timer(struct vcpu *v)
     struct list_head *head = &v->arch.hvm.tm_list;
     struct periodic_time *pt;
 
-    pt_vcpu_lock(v);
+    spin_lock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
 
     list_for_each_entry ( pt, head, list )
     {
@@ -257,7 +241,7 @@ void pt_restore_timer(struct vcpu *v)
 
     pt_thaw_time(v);
 
-    pt_vcpu_unlock(v);
+    spin_unlock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
 }
 
 static void pt_timer_fn(void *data)
@@ -318,7 +302,7 @@ int pt_update_irq(struct vcpu *v)
     int irq, pt_vector = -1;
     bool level;
 
-    pt_vcpu_lock(v);
+    spin_lock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
 
     earliest_pt = NULL;
     max_lag = -1ULL;
@@ -348,7 +332,7 @@ int pt_update_irq(struct vcpu *v)
 
     if ( earliest_pt == NULL )
     {
-        pt_vcpu_unlock(v);
+        spin_unlock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
         return -1;
     }
 
@@ -356,7 +340,7 @@ int pt_update_irq(struct vcpu *v)
     irq = earliest_pt->irq;
     level = earliest_pt->level;
 
-    pt_vcpu_unlock(v);
+    spin_unlock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
 
     switch ( earliest_pt->source )
     {
@@ -403,7 +387,7 @@ int pt_update_irq(struct vcpu *v)
                 time_cb *cb = NULL;
                 void *cb_priv = NULL;
 
-                pt_vcpu_lock(v);
+                spin_lock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
                 /* Make sure the timer is still on the list. */
                 list_for_each_entry ( pt, &v->arch.hvm.tm_list, list )
                     if ( pt == earliest_pt )
@@ -413,7 +397,7 @@ int pt_update_irq(struct vcpu *v)
                         cb_priv = pt->priv;
                         break;
                     }
-                pt_vcpu_unlock(v);
+                spin_unlock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
 
                 if ( cb != NULL )
                     cb(v, cb_priv);
@@ -450,12 +434,12 @@ void pt_intr_post(struct vcpu *v, struct hvm_intack 
intack)
     if ( intack.source == hvm_intsrc_vector )
         return;
 
-    pt_vcpu_lock(v);
+    spin_lock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
 
     pt = is_pt_irq(v, intack);
     if ( pt == NULL )
     {
-        pt_vcpu_unlock(v);
+        spin_unlock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
         return;
     }
 
@@ -464,7 +448,7 @@ void pt_intr_post(struct vcpu *v, struct hvm_intack intack)
     cb = pt->cb;
     cb_priv = pt->priv;
 
-    pt_vcpu_unlock(v);
+    spin_unlock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
 
     if ( cb != NULL )
         cb(v, cb_priv);
@@ -475,12 +459,34 @@ void pt_migrate(struct vcpu *v)
     struct list_head *head = &v->arch.hvm.tm_list;
     struct periodic_time *pt;
 
-    pt_vcpu_lock(v);
+    spin_lock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
 
     list_for_each_entry ( pt, head, list )
         migrate_timer(&pt->timer, v->processor);
 
-    pt_vcpu_unlock(v);
+    spin_unlock(&v->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
+}
+
+static void __destroy_periodic_time(struct periodic_time *pt, bool locked)
+{
+    /* Was this structure previously initialised by create_periodic_time()? */
+    if ( pt->vcpu == NULL )
+        return;
+
+    if (!locked)
+        pt_lock(pt);
+    if ( pt->on_list )
+        list_del(&pt->list);
+    pt->on_list = 0;
+    pt->pending_intr_nr = 0;
+    if (!locked)
+        pt_unlock(pt);
+
+    /*
+     * pt_timer_fn() can run until this kill_timer() returns. We must do this
+     * outside pt_lock() otherwise we can deadlock with pt_timer_fn().
+     */
+    kill_timer(&pt->timer);
 }
 
 void create_periodic_time(
@@ -497,9 +503,16 @@ void create_periodic_time(
         return;
     }
 
-    destroy_periodic_time(pt);
+    spin_lock(&pt->lock);
 
-    write_lock(&v->domain->arch.hvm.pl_time->pt_migrate);
+    if ( pt->vcpu )
+    {
+        spin_lock(&pt->vcpu->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
+
+        __destroy_periodic_time(pt, true);
+
+        spin_unlock(&pt->vcpu->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
+    }
 
     pt->pending_intr_nr = 0;
     pt->do_not_freeze = 0;
@@ -543,33 +556,22 @@ void create_periodic_time(
     pt->cb = cb;
     pt->priv = data;
 
+    spin_lock(&pt->vcpu->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
+
     pt->on_list = 1;
     list_add(&pt->list, &v->arch.hvm.tm_list);
 
+    spin_unlock(&pt->vcpu->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
+
     init_timer(&pt->timer, pt_timer_fn, pt, v->processor);
     set_timer(&pt->timer, pt->scheduled);
 
-    write_unlock(&v->domain->arch.hvm.pl_time->pt_migrate);
+    spin_unlock(&pt->lock);
 }
 
 void destroy_periodic_time(struct periodic_time *pt)
 {
-    /* Was this structure previously initialised by create_periodic_time()? */
-    if ( pt->vcpu == NULL )
-        return;
-
-    pt_lock(pt);
-    if ( pt->on_list )
-        list_del(&pt->list);
-    pt->on_list = 0;
-    pt->pending_intr_nr = 0;
-    pt_unlock(pt);
-
-    /*
-     * pt_timer_fn() can run until this kill_timer() returns. We must do this
-     * outside pt_lock() otherwise we can deadlock with pt_timer_fn().
-     */
-    kill_timer(&pt->timer);
+    __destroy_periodic_time(pt, false);
 }
 
 static void pt_adjust_vcpu(struct periodic_time *pt, struct vcpu *v)
@@ -579,15 +581,25 @@ static void pt_adjust_vcpu(struct periodic_time *pt, 
struct vcpu *v)
     if ( pt->vcpu == NULL )
         return;
 
-    write_lock(&pt->vcpu->domain->arch.hvm.pl_time->pt_migrate);
+    spin_lock(&pt->lock);
+    spin_lock(&pt->vcpu->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
+
+    if ( pt->on_list )
+        list_del(&pt->list);
+
+    spin_unlock(&pt->vcpu->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
+
     pt->vcpu = v;
+
+    spin_lock(&pt->vcpu->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
     if ( pt->on_list )
     {
-        list_del(&pt->list);
         list_add(&pt->list, &v->arch.hvm.tm_list);
         migrate_timer(&pt->timer, v->processor);
     }
-    write_unlock(&pt->vcpu->domain->arch.hvm.pl_time->pt_migrate);
+
+    spin_unlock(&pt->vcpu->arch.hvm.tm_lock);
+    spin_unlock(&pt->lock);
 }
 
 void pt_adjust_global_vcpu_target(struct vcpu *v)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpt.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpt.h
index 39d26cbda496..b0f4af25828b 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpt.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpt.h
@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ struct periodic_time {
     u64 last_plt_gtime;         /* platform time when last IRQ is injected */
     struct timer timer;         /* ac_timer */
     time_cb *cb;
+    spinlock_t lock;            /* protects vcpu field during PT migration. */
+                                /* Needs to be taken before VCPU's tm_lock. */
     void *priv;                 /* point back to platform time source */
 };
 
@@ -128,13 +130,6 @@ struct pl_time {    /* platform time */
     struct RTCState  vrtc;
     struct HPETState vhpet;
     struct PMTState  vpmt;
-    /*
-     * rwlock to prevent periodic_time vCPU migration. Take the lock in read
-     * mode in order to prevent the vcpu field of periodic_time from changing.
-     * Lock must be taken in write mode when changes to the vcpu field are
-     * performed, as it allows exclusive access to all the timers of a domain.
-     */
-    rwlock_t pt_migrate;
     /* guest_time = Xen sys time + stime_offset */
     int64_t stime_offset;
     /* Ensures monotonicity in appropriate timer modes. */
-- 
1.8.3.1




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.