Re: [PATCH 2/2] tools/x86: move arch-specific include/xen/ population into arch-specific rule

[Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("[PATCH 2/2] tools/x86: move arch-specific include/xen/ 
population into arch-specific rule"):
> There's no need for the common "xen-dir" rule to have an arch-specific
> part when there already is a arch-specific rule where this can be taken
> care of.

I think the symlinks being made in this arch-specific code are more
logically part of the xen-dir target than part of the all target.

> I was tempted to also uniformly change the pattern from *autogen.h to
> *-autogen.h right here - thoughts?

I haven't read this in enough detail to know whether that's right, but
if it is right it is IMO preferable.

Thanks,
Ian.