[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] meson: Do not build Xen x86_64-softmmu on Aarch64
- To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@xxxxxxxxx>, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>, <qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 14:45:41 +0000
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xRYnSXPYBibPJi+U9YBc7V4ek1oUjS+3e+O22NblTyI=; b=gZAStSSFytpiY+HazkpVyFYfJrA5k9Iz4/JOsgq67/1tZ7J9SgpvSo9GrL2G1lC7jzNHjpIydceXqY7KBBaqHe6tLlUUtUfNv9cITk4Wkf+hnm7jhfzkhz+nXDmjkO8LUJKb7mjm2D+xjrLjOeaPSQMDrspsKS09CLFz+j1F2M/dLggNyku5GduyiNMelKQRHqferPnHg7AM7tVGVxgFogqqFylPHXL+zCBx9sOPC3o++XSQgWgJ5QGwgP8ZLyBc8WlRE/lujEHNPDySKcKfuleIsq+dLozsinS/4RoUPw2WPAfVYIJOKju4Z57nprYcUMyBLd2dgaPXXmyNG6BGGA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=nn5zwYXNkb0ef6AeKir10oSGopnDnntn6uuwYjgfHT6R9U0JzXY1v6PKSGxgFHwt3h2dbu8xbE0sX0XLpXYFj4wAD9jni+vRL1T8pVyeXztqa4UQJvyJWda6Enw0aOBWyYmT56ykjnq+zemPM/Ku8+YlaKsmfz3aFYQJVVB8JYR0rNXsAkmZnmO/SUPMXkqxa7VC9rojMHXwY0fh/qOZD3XXN0InAp+Gr9oNN7cIwFBnMQn9q2GhGguGB1G57pyjUxnV202bBFSMASUMaiR9u/sljzfT7KNA/TCeNDxZxYvLJ+CBs9O1dAsTOCzlvwzcLip2OTCInlTEFBPFbb/Clg==
- Authentication-results: esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=pass (signature verified) header.i=@citrix.onmicrosoft.com
- Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>, Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 14:46:08 +0000
- Ironport-sdr: QyjeHV3mBdF5z1vqk/bdp1ciVTJe+UiQhBcREfRFcO1JmStmvdIDg4HeHhwzFayatFisrALeuC LNzImbSbvVjrEp52vlNQotLR5pg0krKLQDtgdW+XsDZzwXuZgQPY12ZhyCX0G9bgYkmbeyw3il Sy7rVgBdaRi1l0m1rhEF9gFOfcREsykzycEl2/pqWd8yS/Ps9LBkvLI1Up+mTa7agPHrOl3gNo LqCdsTqj/1aJeR8vfsGe7XKV/Z/dKiG3UZqFP9aDOXkjGn0tw3Vo2e8UBG6SwRxF31AnIhnG5V t+8=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 31/01/2021 14:18, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The Xen on ARM documentation only mentions the i386-softmmu
> target. As the x86_64-softmmu doesn't seem used, remove it
> to avoid wasting cpu cycles building it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@xxxxxxxxx>
As far as I understand, it only gets used at all on ARM for the
blkback=>qcow path, and has nothing to do with I440FX or other boards.
i.e. it is a paravirt disk and nothing else.
xenpv should not be tied to i386-softmmu in the first place, and would
remove a very-WTF-worthy current state of things. That said, I have no
idea how much effort that might be.
~Andrew
|
