[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH V6 00/24] IOREQ feature (+ virtio-mmio) on Arm
On 29.01.21 18:06, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Oleksandr, Hi Julien, Ian On 29/01/2021 11:06, Oleksandr wrote:With Ian's help, I used Osstest to run a Windows job with your branch (see [1]).On 29.01.21 12:51, Oleksandr wrote:On 29.01.21 10:49, Jan Beulich wrote: Hi JanYes, unfortunately I don't have a possibility to test on x86, if I had I would definitely perform testing. I performed code analysis (the diff between V5 and V6 is small enough and these changes unlikely will add regression, so I was thinking that if basic x86 test passed on V5 (thanks to Julien) than it would likely pass on V6 as well), but please don't get me wrong, I *completely* agree that even an obvious single patch must be tested.On 29.01.2021 09:13, Wei Chen wrote:I just tested the v6 and the latest backend service with the latest staging branch.They work well. Tested-by: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>An faod this was again Arm-only testing?What worries me the most is:>>> Unfortunately, I don't have a Windows VM in hand, so I can't confirm if>>> there is no regression there. Can anyone give a try?I am sorry, but would it be possible to make sure that current series doesn't break that use-case? Or this could be tested (and fixed if there is a need) after the feature freeze?The branch used is rebase version because there was a building issue with Mini-OS on your baseline (it is already fixed upstream).The result are the same as the latest run with staging (see [2]). So there is no regression with your series applied! Sounds great, thank you, I really appreciate your help! I will go through the series one last time and then commit it. Thank you! Cheers, [1] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/158785/[2] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/158719/test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64/info.html -- Regards, Oleksandr Tyshchenko
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |