[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without setresuid()
Manuel Bouyer writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without setresuid()"): > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:03:04PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > How about I write a patch splitting the relevant part up into a > > version for systems with setresuid and systems without ? Then you > > could fill in the missing part. > > Yesterday I sent a v2 with the rewriting you suggested. But I'm fine > with you doing the rewrite. OK. > > Should I expect the non-setresuid OS to provide effectively the whole > > orf kill_device_model_uid_child, or just a replacement for the > > setresuid call and surrounding logging, something like > > kill_device_model_uid_child_setresuid > > As far as I'm concerned, kill_device_model_uid_child_setresuid() is enough. > > Unfortunably I don't think I'll have time to work on dm restriction > for NetBSD before 4.15 No problem. Taking a step back, I think this series is very close to going in, if not actually ready. Do you have a git branch version of this ? I find the series of un-numbered patches you have posted make it hard to see the wood for the trees, and collect all the relevant pieces. A git branch version would make the life of the committer considerably easier. If you don't have a favourite public git server you can post me a link to, you could use gitlab.com where we have a mirror of xen.git. https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen (If you need instructions mail me privately.) Regards, Ian.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |