[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Question about xen and Rasp 4B
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:10 PM Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Jukka Kaartinen wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:22 PM Stefano Stabellini > > <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Jukka Kaartinen wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 2:54 AM Stefano Stabellini > > <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, 23 Jan 2021, Jukka Kaartinen wrote: > > > > Thanks for the response! > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:27 AM Stefano Stabellini > > <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > + xen-devel, Roman, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Jukka Kaartinen wrote: > > > > > Hi Stefano, > > > > > I'm Jukka Kaartinen a SW developer working on > > enabling hypervisors on mobile platforms. One of our HW that we > > use on > > > > development is > > > > > Raspberry Pi 4B. I wonder if you could help me a > > bit :). > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to enable the GPU with Xen + Raspberry > > Pi for > > > > dom0. > > https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=232323#p1797605 > > > > > > > > > > I got so far that GPU drivers are loaded (v3d & > > vc4) without errors. But now Xen returns error when X is > > starting: > > > > > (XEN) traps.c:1986:d0v1 HSR=0x93880045 > > pc=0x00007f97b14e70 gva=0x7f7f817000 gpa=0x0000401315d000 > > > > > I tried to debug what causes this and looks like > > find_mmio_handler cannot find handler. > > > > > (See more here: > > https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=232323&start=25#p1801691 > > ) > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas why the handler is not found? > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jukka, > > > > > > > > I am glad to hear that you are interested in Xen on > > RaspberryPi :-) I > > > > haven't tried the GPU yet, I have been using the > > serial only. > > > > Roman, did you ever get the GPU working? > > > > > > > > > > > > The error is a data abort error: Linux is trying to > > access an address > > > > which is not mapped to dom0. The address seems to be > > 0x401315d000. It is > > > > a pretty high address; I looked in device tree but > > couldn't spot it. > > > > > > > > >From the HSR (the syndrom register) it looks like it > > is a translation > > > > fault at EL1 on stage1. As if the Linux address > > mapping was wrong. > > > > Anyone has any ideas how this could happen? Maybe a > > reserved-memory > > > > misconfiguration? > > > > > > > > I had issues with loading the driver in the first place. > > Apparently swiotlb is used, maybe it can cause this. I also > > tried to > > > enable CMA. > > > > config.txt: > > > > dtoverlay=vc4-fkms-v3d,cma=320M@0x0-0x40000000 > > > > gpu_mem=128 > > > > > > Also looking at your other reply and the implementation of > > > vc4_bo_create, it looks like this is a CMA problem. > > > > > > It would be good to run a test with the swiotlb-xen disabled: > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/mm.c b/arch/arm/xen/mm.c > > > index 467fa225c3d0..2bdd12785d14 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/xen/mm.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/mm.c > > > @@ -138,8 +138,7 @@ void > > xen_destroy_contiguous_region(phys_addr_t pstart, unsigned int order) > > > static int __init xen_mm_init(void) > > > { > > > struct gnttab_cache_flush cflush; > > > - if (!xen_initial_domain()) > > > - return 0; > > > + return 0; > > > xen_swiotlb_init(1, false); > > > > > > cflush.op = 0; > > > > > > With this change the kernel is not booting up. (btw. I'm using USB > > SSD for my OS.) > > > [ 0.071081] bcm2835-dma fe007000.dma: Unable to set DMA mask > > > [ 0.076277] bcm2835-dma fe007b00.dma: Unable to set DMA mask > > > (XEN) physdev.c:16:d0v0 PHYSDEVOP cmd=25: not implemented > > > (XEN) physdev.c:16:d0v0 PHYSDEVOP cmd=15: not implemented > > > [ 0.592695] pci 0000:00:00.0: Failed to add - passthrough or > > MSI/MSI-X might fail! > > > (XEN) physdev.c:16:d0v0 PHYSDEVOP cmd=15: not implemented > > > [ 0.606819] pci 0000:01:00.0: Failed to add - passthrough or > > MSI/MSI-X might fail! > > > [ 1.212820] usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error 18 > > > [ 1.452815] usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error 18 > > > [ 1.820813] usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error 18 > > > [ 2.060815] usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error 18 > > > [ 2.845548] usb 1-1: device descriptor read/8, error -61 > > > [ 2.977603] usb 1-1: device descriptor read/8, error -61 > > > [ 3.237530] usb 1-1: device descriptor read/8, error -61 > > > [ 3.369585] usb 1-1: device descriptor read/8, error -61 > > > [ 3.480765] usb usb1-port1: unable to enumerate USB device > > > > > > Traces stop here. I could try with a memory card. Maybe it makes a > > difference. > > > > This is very surprising. Disabling swiotlb-xen should make things > > better > > not worse. The only reason I can think of why it could make things > > worse > > is if Linux runs out of low memory. Julien's patch > > 437b0aa06a014ce174e24c0d3530b3e9ab19b18b for Xen should have addressed > > that issue though. Julien, any ideas? > > > > I really don't know if this is a problem but in the allocate_memory_11 > > arch_get_dma_bitsize is called. That should return the > > platform->dma_bitsize but at the early stage of boot platform is not > > initialized so default 32 is returned. I tried changing the hard code > > from 32 -> 30 but it didn't make any difference. > > static void __init allocate_memory_11(struct domain *d, > > struct kernel_info *kinfo) > > { > > const unsigned int min_low_order = > > get_order_from_bytes(min_t(paddr_t, dom0_mem, MB(128))); > > const unsigned int min_order = get_order_from_bytes(MB(4)); > > struct page_info *pg; > > unsigned int order = get_allocation_size(kinfo->unassigned_mem); > > int i; > > > > bool lowmem = true; > > unsigned int lowmem_bitsize = min(32U, arch_get_dma_bitsize()); > > > > also here the place where static dma_bitsize is set is not called for dom0 > > > > void __init end_boot_allocator(void) > > { > > .... > > if ( !dma_bitsize && (num_online_nodes() > 1) ) > > dma_bitsize = arch_get_dma_bitsize(); > > > > > > and will lead alloc_domheap_pages not to use dma_bitsize since it is not > > set. > > struct page_info *alloc_domheap_pages( > > struct domain *d, unsigned int order, unsigned int memflags) > > { > > > > uses static: dma_bitsize and currently is not set for raspberry pi. > > You can easily check from the device tree in dom0 what memory range was > allocated for it by Xen. The memory node is simply called "memory". We > might be able to understand if the range is too high from there. > > FYI I have just ordered a micro HDMI cable so I might be able to provide > more useful feedback in the following days. Speaking of which -- I'm also curious where this leads (esp. given our use of newer, non-Rpi specific kernels) so I can run all sorts of experiments with EVE too. Thanks, Roman.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |