[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 7/7] make-flight: Stripy xenstored
On 22.01.21 17:22, Ian Jackson wrote: Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 7/7] make-flight: Stripy xenstored"):A couple of quick questions/observations. Does this cope in a sensible way if, for whatever reason, the chosen daemon isn't present?That would depend on what you mean by "sensible". I think that given that we now think we support both on all architectures, "sensible" means "the tests fail if one of the xenstoreds doesn't build". And that's what this will do :-).How hard would it be to add the 3rd option, stub-cxenstored into this mix? It is just one other key in xencommons to tweak.We would presumably want to do that for a smaller set of tests, but yes, that could be done as a future enhancement.SUPPORT.md doesn't appear to make any statements about the disposition of xenstoreds, but stub-cxenstored is used by at least two major downstreams so is obviously has security support in practice, and ought to be tested.Looking at /etc/default/xencommons, I think that testing would be done by setting XENSTORETYPE=domain. Do we want to test stub C xentored or stub ocaml xenstored or both ? The config seems not to have a way to specify which. Do we build only one ? There is only stub C xenstored in our build. Juergen Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |