[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH 2/4] x86/ACPI: don't overwrite FADT
When marking fields invalid for our own purposes, we should do so in our local copy (so we will notice later on), not in the firmware provided one (which another entity may want to look at again, e.g. after kexec). Also mark the function parameter const to notice such issues right away. Instead use the pointer at the firmware copy for specifying an adjacent printk()'s arguments. If nothing else this at least reduces the number of relocations the assembler hasto emit and the linker has to process. Fixes: 62d1a69a4e9f ("ACPI: support v5 (reduced HW) sleep interface") Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static int __init acpi_invalidate_bgrt(s /* Get pm1x_cnt and pm1x_evt information for ACPI sleep */ static void __init -acpi_fadt_parse_sleep_info(struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt) +acpi_fadt_parse_sleep_info(const struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt) { struct acpi_table_facs *facs = NULL; uint64_t facs_pa; @@ -362,10 +362,10 @@ acpi_fadt_parse_sleep_info(struct acpi_t printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "v5 SLEEP INFO: control[%d:%"PRIx64"]," " status[%d:%"PRIx64"]\n", - acpi_sinfo.sleep_control.space_id, - acpi_sinfo.sleep_control.address, - acpi_sinfo.sleep_status.space_id, - acpi_sinfo.sleep_status.address); + fadt->sleep_control.space_id, + fadt->sleep_control.address, + fadt->sleep_status.space_id, + fadt->sleep_status.address); if ((fadt->sleep_control.address && (fadt->sleep_control.bit_offset || @@ -384,8 +384,8 @@ acpi_fadt_parse_sleep_info(struct acpi_t fadt->sleep_status.bit_offset, fadt->sleep_status.bit_width, fadt->sleep_status.access_width); - fadt->sleep_control.address = 0; - fadt->sleep_status.address = 0; + acpi_sinfo.sleep_control.address = 0; + acpi_sinfo.sleep_status.address = 0; } }
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |