[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [RFC PATCH] xen/arm: domain_build: Ignore empty memory bank
Previously Xen had stopped processing Device Trees if an empty (size == 0) memory bank was found. Commit 5a37207df52066efefe419c677b089a654d37afc changed this behavior to ignore such banks. Unfortunately this means these empty nodes are visible to code which accesses the device trees. Have domain_build also ignore these entries. Signed-off-by: Elliott Mitchell <ehem+xen@xxxxxxx> --- Looking at this, I think the problem is likely even larger than this and really needs a proper solution closer to the core of the device-tree code. Likely either all device-tree handling code needs to be audited for ignoring zero-size entries, or the core should take care of these and nothing outside of xen/common/device_tree.c should ever see these (except perhaps to confirm such entries exist as flags). Notably this is the *second* location where zero-size device-tree entries need to be ignored, action might be worthwhile before a third is confirmed. --- xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c index e824ba34b0..0b83384bd3 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c @@ -1405,6 +1405,11 @@ static int __init handle_device(struct domain *d, struct dt_device_node *dev, { struct map_range_data mr_data = { .d = d, .p2mt = p2mt }; res = dt_device_get_address(dev, i, &addr, &size); + + /* Some DT may describe empty bank, ignore them */ + if ( !size ) + continue; + if ( res ) { printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to retrieve address %u for %s\n", -- -- (\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/) \BS ( | ehem+sigmsg@xxxxxxx PGP 87145445 | ) / \_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/ 8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |