[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
 
- To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>, 	linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:28:48 -0800
 
- Cc: alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  GR-everest-linux-l2@xxxxxxxxxxx, GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,  intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, intel-wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux1394-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-afs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-atm-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-decnet-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-geode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-hams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hwmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-i3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx,  linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sctp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, op-tee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  oss-drivers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  rds-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  samba-technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tipc-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  usb-storage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wcn36xx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  x86@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Delivery-date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:29:15 +0000
 
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
 
 
 
On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 12:21 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in
> order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang.
> 
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, explicitly
> add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough statements instead of just
> letting the code fall through to the next case.
> 
> Notice that in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, this
> change[1] is meant to be reverted at some point. So, this patch helps
> to move in that direction.
This was a bit hard to parse for a second or three.
Thanks Gustavo.
How was this change done?
 
 
    
     |