[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM][PATCH 0/2] Remove Xen PVH dependency on PCI

To: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@xxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, "Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:04:43 +0100
Authentication-results: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:04:54 +0000
Ironport-sdr: RkRU6LoFb+K0uroA17V3eGSGvjuUUGMUujSWCqKRxmtq2qsv7vOw8BkkHt9zfs7MM0a9cL4/Ft 2dUiIVTILpDeiiulU9gHbgx2gjg8+21xfs5GSiPybMgsipLEe8gUsLsaJNrwhMSLLMQsemLMrK wdiahS+UH2PIC8/GMR79mm8Bs/hMc8XQYiz5aXGXmdH8ykSz0VWu7I/DAiuKR6KfhXRT9DtM9v zbRh/CILhefBnCwff+hwhCnTEGRqgmAYgX+34s8k22jyocg6vnUZJwOQKaxQIPzmtyJ671KRly GoE=
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 14/10/2020 18:53, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> A Xen PVH domain doesn't have a PCI bus or devices,

[*] Yet.

> so it doesn't need PCI support built in.

Untangling the dependences is a good thing, but eventually we plan to
put an optional PCI bus back in, e.g. for SRIOV usecases.

~Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM][PATCH 0/2] Remove Xen PVH dependency on PCI
  - From: Jason Andryuk

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] Remove Xen PVH dependency on PCI
  - From: Jason Andryuk

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86/traps: 'Fix' safety of read_registers() in #DF path
Next by Date: [PATCH v2] x86/smpboot: Don't unconditionally call memguard_guard_stack() in cpu_smpboot_alloc()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen: Kconfig: nest Xen guest options
Next by thread: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM][PATCH 0/2] Remove Xen PVH dependency on PCI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.