[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH RFC PKS/PMEM 33/58] fs/cramfs: Utilize new kmap_thread()
 
- To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:01:49 +0100
 
- Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>,	"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>,	Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>,	Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx>, X86 ML <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>,	Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Linux MM <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	KVM list <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Kexec Mailing List <kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-efi <linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	linux-aio@xxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-erofs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-ntfs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	reiserfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nilfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, ecryptfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	linux-afs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-rdma <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx, samba-technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	intel-wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
- Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 20:02:59 +0000
 
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
 
 
 
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 08:36:43PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> static inline void copy_to_highpage(struct page *to, void *vfrom, unsigned 
> int size)
> {
>       char *vto = kmap_atomic(to);
> 
>       memcpy(vto, vfrom, size);
>       kunmap_atomic(vto);
> }
> 
> in linux/highmem.h ?
You mean, like
static void memcpy_from_page(char *to, struct page *page, size_t offset, size_t 
len)
{
        char *from = kmap_atomic(page);
        memcpy(to, from + offset, len);
        kunmap_atomic(from);
}
static void memcpy_to_page(struct page *page, size_t offset, const char *from, 
size_t len)
{
        char *to = kmap_atomic(page);
        memcpy(to + offset, from, len);
        kunmap_atomic(to);
}
static void memzero_page(struct page *page, size_t offset, size_t len)
{
        char *addr = kmap_atomic(page);
        memset(addr + offset, 0, len);
        kunmap_atomic(addr);
}
in lib/iov_iter.c?  FWIW, I don't like that "highpage" in the name and
highmem.h as location - these make perfect sense regardless of highmem;
they are normal memory operations with page + offset used instead of
a pointer...
 
    
     |