Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/shim: don't permit HVM and PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE at the same time

[Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:08:00PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This combination doesn't really make sense (and there likely are more);
> in particular even if the code built with both options set, HVM guests
> wouldn't work (and I think one wouldn't be able to create one in the
> first place). The alternative here would be some presumably intrusive
> #ifdef-ary to get this combination to actually build (but still not
> work) again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

I can see the desire for being able to remove code, and the point
Andrew made about one option not making another disappear in a
completely different menu section.

Yet I don't see how to converge the two together, unless we completely
change our menu layouts, and even then I'm not sure I see how we could
structure this. Hence:

Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, Roger.