[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Yet another S3 issue in Xen 4.14
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 01:59:32PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 01.10.2020 03:12, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > After patching the previous issue ("x86/S3: Fix Shadow Stack resume > > path") I still encounter issues resume from S3. > > Since I had it working on Xen 4.13 on this particular hardware (Thinkpad > > P52), I bisected it and got this: > > > > commit 4304ff420e51b973ec9eb9dafd64a917dd9c0fb1 > > Author: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed Dec 11 20:59:19 2019 +0000 > > > > x86/S3: Drop {save,restore}_rest_processor_state() completely > > > > There is no need to save/restore FS/GS/XCR0 state. It will be handled > > suitably on the context switch away from the idle. > > > > The CR4 restoration in restore_rest_processor_state() was actually > > fighting > > later code in enter_state() which tried to keep CR4.MCE clear until > > everything > > was set up. Delete the intermediate restoration, and defer final > > restoration > > until after MCE is reconfigured. > > > > Restoring PAT can be done earlier, and ideally before paging is > > enabled. By > > moving it into the trampoline during the setup for 64bit, the call can > > be > > dropped from cpu_init(). The EFI path boot path doesn't disable > > paging, so > > make the adjustment when switching onto Xen's pagetables. > > > > The only remaing piece of restoration is load_system_tables(), so > > suspend.c > > can be deleted in its entirety. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > > > > Parent of this commit suspends and resumes just fine. With this commit > > applied, it (I think) it panics, at least I get reboot after 5s. Sadly, I > > don't have serial console there. > > > > I tried also master and stable-4.14 with this commit reverted (and also > > the other fix applied), but it doesn't work. In this case I get a hang on > > resume (power led still flashing, but fan woke up). There are probably > > some other dependencies. > > Since bisection may also point you at some intermediate breakage, which > these last results of yours seem to support, could you check whether > 55f8c389d434 put immediately on top of the above commit makes a difference, > and if so resume bisecting from there? Nope, 4304ff420e51b973ec9eb9dafd64a917dd9c0fb1 with 55f8c389d434 on top it still hangs on resume. -- Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Invisible Things Lab A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? Attachment:
signature.asc
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |