[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [patch V2 34/46] PCI/MSI: Make arch_.*_msi_irq[s] fallbacks selectable



On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:54:52AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 13:17 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The arch_.*_msi_irq[s] fallbacks are compiled in whether an architecture
> > requires them or not. Architectures which are fully utilizing hierarchical
> > irq domains should never call into that code.
> > 
> > It's not only architectures which depend on that by implementing one or
> > more of the weak functions, there is also a bunch of drivers which relies
> > on the weak functions which invoke msi_controller::setup_irq[s] and
> > msi_controller::teardown_irq.
> > 
> > Make the architectures and drivers which rely on them select them in Kconfig
> > and if not selected replace them by stub functions which emit a warning and
> > fail the PCI/MSI interrupt allocation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Today's linux-next will have some warnings on s390x:
> 
> .config: https://gitlab.com/cailca/linux-mm/-/blob/master/s390.config
> 
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS
>   Depends on [n]: PCI [=n]
>   Selected by [y]:
>   - S390 [=y]
> 
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS
>   Depends on [n]: PCI [=n]
>   Selected by [y]:
>   - S390 [=y]
>

Yes, as well as on mips and sparc which also don't FORCE_PCI.
This seems to work for s390:

diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
index b0b7acf07eb8..41136fbe909b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -192,3 +192,3 @@ config S390
        select PCI_MSI                  if PCI
-       select PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS
+       select PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS   if PCI
        select SET_FS



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.