[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: do not mark IO regions as Xen heap
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 05:49:45PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 21.09.2020 17:35, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:22:26PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> On 10.09.2020 15:35, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > >>> arch_init_memory will treat all the gaps on the physical memory map > >>> between RAM regions as MMIO and use share_xen_page_with_guest in order > >>> to assign them to dom_io. This has the side effect of setting the Xen > >>> heap flag on such pages, and thus is_special_page would then return > >>> true which is an issue in epte_get_entry_emt because such pages will > >>> be forced to use write-back cache attributes. > >>> > >>> Fix this by introducing a new helper to assign the MMIO regions to > >>> dom_io without setting the Xen heap flag on the pages, so that > >>> is_special_page will return false and the pages won't be forced to use > >>> write-back cache attributes. > >>> > >>> Fixes: 81fd0d3ca4b2cd ('x86/hvm: simplify 'mmio_direct' check in > >>> epte_get_entry_emt()') > >> > >> Is this really the correct commit? I had this queued for backport, > >> and ended up discarding it from the queue based on this tag, just > >> to then noticing that I remembered correctly that I did backport > >> ca24b2ffdbd9 ("x86/hvm: set 'ipat' in EPT for special pages") to > >> the stable trees already. Isn't it _this_ commit which the change > >> here fixes? > > > > My bisection pointed to that exact commit as the one that broke my PVH > > dom0 setup, so yes, I'm quite sure that's the commit at least on the > > box that I've bisected it. > > > > ca24b2ffdbd9 was still fine because previous to the is_special_page > > check loop there was still the `if ( direct_mmio ) ...` handling, > > which made all MMIO regions except for the APIC access page forcefully > > have it's cache attributes set to UC. > > Ah yes, I see - thanks. Makes me less sure whether the patch > here really wants backporting. As long as 81fd0d3ca4b2cd is not backported, then I would argue to not backport this either. I don't see much benefit in backporting this alone, and the risk of introducing a non intended functionality change as a result of not marking MMIO pages as Xen heap is possible. Thanks, Roger.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |