[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] libxl: workaround gcc 10.2 maybe-uninitialized warning
- To: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:31:47 +0100
- Authentication-results: esa6.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xxxxxxx>, Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:31:55 +0000
- Ironport-sdr: h85FN4YJ7R1yXJbHrwzw9maVb4BP5n+F+3mm7EokYrppIjQEBWq61wvmUHZQg6a0kX0fPu7dnB uDBCfyI7m50+twe7U1+NZq2UqIXXqGjk3YRTNh/Z5PFKX+HWDV6uAlIlRekZXwsTHuekQC8SNA EHnq9Sf/tseS+Il6tg7JGuoPOmD+KmOQ+ytYPWLSfiU8mfmyI7k0FngJaSs+zFdUEunnLXp67r ekmf8C7TwGZAq1PQRcIJ4BGyDnTHl88mXSsoPfxzpfujitraFZa4RciugWAhaImV7woIxMTSKQ 5xE=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki writes ("[PATCH 1/2] libxl: workaround gcc 10.2
maybe-uninitialized warning"):
> It seems xlu_pci_parse_bdf has a state machine that is too complex for
> gcc to understand. The build fails with:
Reviewed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
