Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools/xenstore: Do not abort xenstore-ls if a node disappears while iterating

[Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:23:10PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 17:40 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools/xenstore: Do
> > not abort xenstore-ls if a node disappears while iterating"):
> > > And making a node visible by XS_DIRECTORY[_PART] doesn't count as
> > > reading it.  But it does count as reading the parent ?
> > > In principle adding or removing a node could be made to count as a
> > > change to the containing directory.  But I don't think doing this
> > > as a
> > > response to David's issue is sensible.
> > 
> > So, err, putting that together and reviewing the state of the world:
> > 
> > I still think David's 1/ patch is good.
> > Everyone else: is there some reason we shouldn't commit 1/
> > immediately ?

OK I will turn this into an ack and apply this patch. Sorry this fell
off my radar somehow.

Wei.

> 
> It was deliberately split out so that it could indeed be applied
> immediately when it was posted in March.