|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [RFC PATCH V1 04/12] xen/arm: Introduce arch specific bits for IOREQ/DM features
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 21:40, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> Sorry for the possible format issue.
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:42 PM Oleksandr <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11.08.20 20:50, Julien Grall wrote:
>>
>> Hi Julien
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/08/2020 18:09, Oleksandr wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 05.08.20 12:32, Julien Grall wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Julien, Stefano
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
>> >>>>> index 5fdb6e8..5823f11 100644
>> >>>>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
>> >>>>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
>> >>>>> @@ -385,10 +385,11 @@ static inline int
>> >>>>> set_foreign_p2m_entry(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn,
>> >>>>> mfn_t mfn)
>> >>>>> {
>> >>>>> /*
>> >>>>> - * NOTE: If this is implemented then proper reference
>> >>>>> counting of
>> >>>>> - * foreign entries will need to be implemented.
>> >>>>> + * XXX: handle properly reference. It looks like the page may
>> >>>>> not always
>> >>>>> + * belong to d.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Just as a reference, and without taking away anything from the
>> >>>> comment,
>> >>>> I think that QEMU is doing its own internal reference counting for
>> >>>> these
>> >>>> mappings.
>> >>>
>> >>> I am not sure how this matters here? We can't really trust the DM to
>> >>> do the right thing if it is not running in dom0.
>> >>>
>> >>> But, IIRC, the problem is some of the pages doesn't belong to do a
>> >>> domain, so it is not possible to treat them as foreign mapping (e.g.
>> >>> you wouldn't be able to grab a reference). This investigation was
>> >>> done a couple of years ago, so this may have changed in recent Xen.
>> >>
>> >> Well, emulator is going to be used in driver domain, so this TODO
>> >> must be resolved. I suspect that the check for a hardware domain in
>> >> acquire_resource() which I skipped in a hackish way [1] could be
>> >> simply removed once proper reference counting is implemented in Xen,
>> >> correct?
>> >
>> > It depends how you are going to solve it. If you manage to solve it in
>> > a generic way, then yes you could resolve. If not (i.e. it is solved
>> > in an arch-specific way), we would need to keep the check on arch that
>> > are not able to deal with it. See more below.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Could you please provide some pointers on that problem? Maybe some
>> >> questions need to be investigated again? Unfortunately, it is not
>> >> completely clear to me the direction to follow...
>> >>
>> >> ***
>> >> I am wondering whether the similar problem exists on x86 as well?
>> >
>> > It is somewhat different. On Arm, we are able to handle properly
>> > foreign mapping (i.e. mapping page from a another domain) as we would
>> > grab a reference on the page (see XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign handling in
>> > xenmem_add_to_physmap()). The reference will then be released when the
>> > entry is removed from the P2M (see p2m_free_entry()).
>> >
>> > If all the pages given to set_foreign_p2m_entry() belong to a domain,
>> > then you could use the same approach.
>> >
>> > However, I remember to run into some issues in some of the cases. I
>> > had a quick looked at the caller and I wasn't able to find any use
>> > cases that may be an issue.
>> >
>> > The refcounting in the IOREQ code has changed after XSA-276 (this was
>> > found while working on the Arm port). Probably the best way to figure
>> > out if it works would be to try it and see if it fails.
>> >
>> > Note that set_foreign_p2m_entry() doesn't have a parameter for the
>> > foreign domain. You would need to add a extra parameter for this.
>> >
>> >> The FIXME tag (before checking for a hardware domain in
>> >> acquire_resource()) in the common code makes me think it is a common
>> >> issue. From other side x86's
>> >> implementation of set_foreign_p2m_entry() is exists unlike Arm's one
>> >> (which returned -EOPNOTSUPP so far). Or these are unrelated?
>> >
>> > At the moment, x86 doesn't support refcounting for foreign mapping.
>> > Hence the reason to restrict them to the hardware domain.
>>
>>
>> Thank you for the pointers!
>>
>>
>> I checked that all pages given to set_foreign_p2m_entry() belonged to a
>> domain (at least in my use-case). I noticed two calls for acquiring
>> resource at the DomU creation time, the first call was for grant table
>> (single gfn)
>> and the second for ioreq server which carried 2 gfns (for shared and
>> buffered rings I assume). For the test purpose, I passed these gfns to
>> get_page_from_gfn() in order to grab references on the pages, after that
>> I tried to destroy DomU without calling put_page() for these pages. The
>> fact that I couldn't destroy DomU completely (a zombie domain was
>> observed) made me think that references were still taken, so worked as
>> expected.
>>
>>
>> I implemented a test patch (which uses approach from
>> xenmem_add_to_physmap_one() for XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign case) to check
>> whether it would work.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/p2m.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> xen/common/memory.c | 2 +-
>> xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h | 12 ++----------
>> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> index e9ccba8..7359715 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> @@ -1385,6 +1385,36 @@ int guest_physmap_remove_page(struct domain *d,
>> gfn_t gfn, mfn_t mfn,
>> return p2m_remove_mapping(d, gfn, (1 << page_order), mfn);
>> }
>>
>> +int set_foreign_p2m_entry(struct domain *d, struct domain *fd,
>> + unsigned long gfn, mfn_t mfn)
>> +{
>> + struct page_info *page;
>> + p2m_type_t p2mt;
>> + int rc;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Take reference to the foreign domain page. Reference will be
>> released
>> + * in p2m_put_l3_page().
>> + */
>> + page = get_page_from_gfn(fd, gfn, &p2mt, P2M_ALLOC);
>> + if ( !page )
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if ( p2m_is_ram(p2mt) )
>> + p2mt = (p2mt == p2m_ram_rw) ? p2m_map_foreign_rw :
>> p2m_map_foreign_ro;
>> + else
>> + {
>> + put_page(page);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rc = guest_physmap_add_entry(d, _gfn(gfn), mfn, 0, p2mt);
>> + if ( rc )
>> + put_page(page);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static struct page_info *p2m_allocate_root(void)
>> {
>> struct page_info *page;
>> diff --git a/xen/common/memory.c b/xen/common/memory.c
>> index 8d9f0a8..1de1d4f 100644
>> --- a/xen/common/memory.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/memory.c
>> @@ -1171,7 +1171,7 @@ static int acquire_resource(
>>
>> for ( i = 0; !rc && i < xmar.nr_frames; i++ )
>> {
>> - rc = set_foreign_p2m_entry(currd, gfn_list[i],
>> + rc = set_foreign_p2m_entry(currd, d, gfn_list[i],
>> _mfn(mfn_list[i]));
>> /* rc should be -EIO for any iteration other than the first */
>> if ( rc && i )
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
>> index 5823f11..53ce373 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
>> @@ -381,16 +381,8 @@ static inline gfn_t gfn_next_boundary(gfn_t gfn,
>> unsigned int order)
>> return gfn_add(gfn, 1UL << order);
>> }
>>
>> -static inline int set_foreign_p2m_entry(struct domain *d, unsigned long
>> gfn,
>> - mfn_t mfn)
>> -{
>> - /*
>> - * XXX: handle properly reference. It looks like the page may not
>> always
>> - * belong to d.
>> - */
>> -
>> - return guest_physmap_add_entry(d, _gfn(gfn), mfn, 0, p2m_ram_rw);
>> -}
>> +int set_foreign_p2m_entry(struct domain *d, struct domain *fd,
>> + unsigned long gfn, mfn_t mfn);
>>
>> /*
>> * A vCPU has cache enabled only when the MMU is enabled and data cache
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>>
>> And with that patch applied I was facing a BUG when destroying/rebooting
>> DomU. The call of put_page_alloc_ref() in hvm_free_ioreq_mfn() triggered
>> that BUG:
>>
>>
>> Rebooting domain 2
>> root@generic-armv8-xt-dom0:~# (XEN) Xen BUG at
>> ...tAUTOINC+bb71237a55-r0/git/xen/include/xen/mm.h:683
>> (XEN) ----[ Xen-4.14.0 arm64 debug=y Not tainted ]----
>> (XEN) CPU: 3
>> (XEN) PC: 0000000000246f28 ioreq.c#hvm_free_ioreq_mfn+0x68/0x6c
>> (XEN) LR: 0000000000246ef0
>> (XEN) SP: 0000800725eafd80
>> (XEN) CPSR: 60000249 MODE:64-bit EL2h (Hypervisor, handler)
>> (XEN) X0: 0000000000000001 X1: 403fffffffffffff X2: 000000000000001f
>> (XEN) X3: 0000000080000000 X4: 0000000000000000 X5: 0000000000400000
>> (XEN) X6: 0000800725eafe24 X7: 0000ffffd1ef3e08 X8: 0000000000000020
>> (XEN) X9: 0000000000000000 X10: 00e800008ecebf53 X11: 0400000000000000
>> (XEN) X12: ffff7e00013b3ac0 X13: 0000000000000002 X14: 0000000000000001
>> (XEN) X15: 0000000000000001 X16: 0000000000000029 X17: 0000ffff9badb3d0
>> (XEN) X18: 000000000000010f X19: 0000000810e60e38 X20: 0000800725e68ec0
>> (XEN) X21: 0000000000000000 X22: 00008004dc0404a0 X23: 000000005a000ea1
>> (XEN) X24: ffff8000460ec280 X25: 0000000000000124 X26: 000000000000001d
>> (XEN) X27: ffff000008ad1000 X28: ffff800052e65100 FP: ffff0000223dbd20
>> (XEN)
>> (XEN) VTCR_EL2: 80023558
>> (XEN) VTTBR_EL2: 0002000765f04000
>> (XEN)
>> (XEN) SCTLR_EL2: 30cd183d
>> (XEN) HCR_EL2: 000000008078663f
>> (XEN) TTBR0_EL2: 00000000781c5000
>> (XEN)
>> (XEN) ESR_EL2: f2000001
>> (XEN) HPFAR_EL2: 0000000000030010
>> (XEN) FAR_EL2: ffff000008005f00
>> (XEN)
>> (XEN) Xen stack trace from sp=0000800725eafd80:
>> (XEN) 0000800725e68ec0 0000000000247078 00008004dc040000 00000000002477c8
>> (XEN) ffffffffffffffea 0000000000000001 ffff8000460ec500 0000000000000002
>> (XEN) 000000000024645c 00000000002462dc 0000800725eafeb0 0000800725eafeb0
>> (XEN) 0000800725eaff30 0000000060000145 000000000027882c 0000800725eafeb0
>> (XEN) 0000800725eafeb0 01ff00000935de80 00008004dc040000 0000000000000006
>> (XEN) ffff800000000000 0000000000000002 000000005a000ea1 000000019bc60002
>> (XEN) 0000ffffd1ef3e08 0000000000000020 0000000000000004 000000000027c7d8
>> (XEN) 000000005a000ea1 0000800725eafeb0 000000005a000ea1 0000000000279f98
>> (XEN) 0000000000000000 ffff8000460ec200 0000800725eaffb8 0000000000262c58
>> (XEN) 0000000000262c4c 07e0000160000249 0000000000000002 0000000000000001
>> (XEN) ffff8000460ec500 ffff8000460ec508 ffff8000460ec208 ffff800052e65100
>> (XEN) 000000005060b478 0000ffffd20f3000 ffff7e00013c77e0 0000000000000000
>> (XEN) 00e800008ecebf53 0400000000000000 ffff7e00013b3ac0 0000000000000002
>> (XEN) 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 0000000000000029 0000ffff9badb3d0
>> (XEN) 000000000000010f ffff8000460ec210 ffff8000460ec200 ffff8000460ec210
>> (XEN) 0000000000000001 ffff8000460ec500 ffff8000460ec280 0000000000000124
>> (XEN) 000000000000001d ffff000008ad1000 ffff800052e65100 ffff0000223dbd20
>> (XEN) ffff000008537004 ffffffffffffffff ffff0000080c17e4 5a000ea160000145
>> (XEN) 0000000060000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff800052e65100
>> (XEN) ffff0000223dbd20 0000ffff9badb3dc 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> (XEN) Xen call trace:
>> (XEN) [<0000000000246f28>] ioreq.c#hvm_free_ioreq_mfn+0x68/0x6c (PC)
>> (XEN) [<0000000000246ef0>] ioreq.c#hvm_free_ioreq_mfn+0x30/0x6c (LR)
>> (XEN)
>> (XEN)
>> (XEN) ****************************************
>> (XEN) Panic on CPU 3:
>> (XEN) Xen BUG at ...tAUTOINC+bb71237a55-r0/git/xen/include/xen/mm.h:683
>> (XEN) ****************************************
>> (XEN)
>> (XEN) Reboot in five seconds...
>> (XEN)
>> (XEN) ****************************************
>> (XEN) Panic on CPU 0:
>> (XEN) PSCI cpu off failed for CPU0 err=-3
>> (XEN) ****************************************
>> (XEN)
>> (XEN) Reboot in five seconds...
>>
>>
>>
>> Either I did something wrong (most likely) or there is an issue with
>> page ref-counting in the IOREQ code. I am still trying to understand
>> what is going on.
>> Some notes on that:
>> 1. I checked that put_page() was called for these pages in
>> p2m_put_l3_page() when destroying domain. This happened before
>> hvm_free_ioreq_mfn() execution.
>> 2. There was no BUG detected if I passed "p2m_ram_rw" instead of
>> "p2m_map_foreign_rw" in guest_physmap_add_entry(), but the DomU couldn't
>> be fully destroyed because of the reference taken.
>
>
> I think I understand why BUG is triggered.
>
> I checked "page->count_info & PGC_count_mask" and noticed that
> get_page_from_gfn() doesn't seem to increase ref counter (but it should?)
>
> 1. hvm_alloc_ioreq_mfn() -> ref 2
> 2. set_foreign_p2m_entry() -> ref still 2
> 3. p2m_put_l3_page() -> ref 1
> 4. hvm_free_ioreq_mfn() calls put_page_alloc_ref() with ref 1 which triggers
> BUG
I looked again at your diff. It is actually not doing the right thing.
The parameter 'gfn' is a physical frame from 'd' (your current domain)
not 'fd'.
So you will end up grabbing a reference count on the wrong page. You
are quite lucky the 'gfn' is also valid for your foreign domain.
But in this case, you already have the MFN in hand. So what you want
to do is something like:
if (!get_page(mfn_to_page(mfn), fd))
return -EINVAL;
/* Map page */
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |