[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 08/14] kernel-doc: public/memory.h
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 07.08.2020 01:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Convert in-code comments to kernel-doc format wherever possible. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > xen/include/public/memory.h | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > > 1 file changed, 155 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/xen/include/public/memory.h b/xen/include/public/memory.h > > index 21057ed78e..4c57ed213c 100644 > > --- a/xen/include/public/memory.h > > +++ b/xen/include/public/memory.h > > @@ -30,7 +30,9 @@ > > #include "xen.h" > > #include "physdev.h" > > > > -/* > > +/** > > + * DOC: XENMEM_increase_reservation and XENMEM_decrease_reservation > > + * > > * Increase or decrease the specified domain's memory reservation. Returns > > the > > * number of extents successfully allocated or freed. > > * arg == addr of struct xen_memory_reservation. > > @@ -40,29 +42,37 @@ > > #define XENMEM_populate_physmap 6 > > > > #if __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__ >= 0x00030209 > > -/* > > - * Maximum # bits addressable by the user of the allocated region (e.g., > > I/O > > - * devices often have a 32-bit limitation even in 64-bit systems). If zero > > - * then the user has no addressing restriction. This field is not used by > > - * XENMEM_decrease_reservation. > > +/** > > + * DOC: XENMEMF_* > > + * > > + * - XENMEMF_address_bits, XENMEMF_get_address_bits: > > + * Maximum # bits addressable by the user of the allocated region > > + * (e.g., I/O devices often have a 32-bit limitation even in 64-bit > > + * systems). If zero then the user has no addressing restriction. > > This > > + * field is not used by XENMEM_decrease_reservation. > > + * - XENMEMF_node, XENMEMF_get_node: NUMA node to allocate from > > + * - XENMEMF_populate_on_demand: Flag to populate physmap with > > populate-on-demand entries > > + * - XENMEMF_exact_node_request, XENMEMF_exact_node: Flag to request > > allocation only from the node specified > > Nit: overly long line I'll fix > > + * - XENMEMF_vnode: Flag to indicate the node specified is virtual node > > */ > > #define XENMEMF_address_bits(x) (x) > > #define XENMEMF_get_address_bits(x) ((x) & 0xffu) > > -/* NUMA node to allocate from. */ > > #define XENMEMF_node(x) (((x) + 1) << 8) > > #define XENMEMF_get_node(x) ((((x) >> 8) - 1) & 0xffu) > > -/* Flag to populate physmap with populate-on-demand entries */ > > #define XENMEMF_populate_on_demand (1<<16) > > -/* Flag to request allocation only from the node specified */ > > #define XENMEMF_exact_node_request (1<<17) > > #define XENMEMF_exact_node(n) (XENMEMF_node(n) | > > XENMEMF_exact_node_request) > > -/* Flag to indicate the node specified is virtual node */ > > #define XENMEMF_vnode (1<<18) > > #endif > > > > +/** > > + * struct xen_memory_reservation > > + */ > > struct xen_memory_reservation { > > > > - /* > > + /** > > + * @extent_start: > > + * > > Take the opportunity and drop the stray blank line? Sure > > @@ -200,90 +236,115 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_machphys_mfn_list_t); > > */ > > #define XENMEM_machphys_compat_mfn_list 25 > > > > -/* > > +#define XENMEM_machphys_mapping 12 > > +/** > > + * struct xen_machphys_mapping - XENMEM_machphys_mapping > > + * > > * Returns the location in virtual address space of the machine_to_phys > > * mapping table. Architectures which do not have a m2p table, or which do > > not > > * map it by default into guest address space, do not implement this > > command. > > * arg == addr of xen_machphys_mapping_t. > > */ > > -#define XENMEM_machphys_mapping 12 > > struct xen_machphys_mapping { > > + /** @v_start: Start virtual address */ > > xen_ulong_t v_start, v_end; /* Start and end virtual addresses. */ > > - xen_ulong_t max_mfn; /* Maximum MFN that can be looked up. */ > > + /** @v_end: End virtual addresses */ > > + xen_ulong_t v_end; > > + /** @max_mfn: Maximum MFN that can be looked up */ > > + xen_ulong_t max_mfn; > > }; > > typedef struct xen_machphys_mapping xen_machphys_mapping_t; > > DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_machphys_mapping_t); > > > > -/* Source mapping space. */ > > +/** > > + * DOC: Source mapping space. > > + * > > + * - XENMAPSPACE_shared_info: shared info page > > + * - XENMAPSPACE_grant_table: grant table page > > + * - XENMAPSPACE_gmfn: GMFN > > + * - XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range: GMFN range, XENMEM_add_to_physmap only. > > + * - XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign: GMFN from another dom, > > + * XENMEM_add_to_physmap_batch only. > > + * - XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio: device mmio region ARM only; the region is > > mapped > > + * in Stage-2 using the Normal > > MemoryInner/Outer > > + * Write-Back Cacheable memory attribute. > > + */ > > /* ` enum phys_map_space { */ > > Isn't this and ... > > > -#define XENMAPSPACE_shared_info 0 /* shared info page */ > > -#define XENMAPSPACE_grant_table 1 /* grant table page */ > > -#define XENMAPSPACE_gmfn 2 /* GMFN */ > > -#define XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range 3 /* GMFN range, XENMEM_add_to_physmap > > only. */ > > -#define XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign 4 /* GMFN from another dom, > > - * XENMEM_add_to_physmap_batch only. */ > > -#define XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio 5 /* device mmio region > > - ARM only; the region is mapped in > > - Stage-2 using the Normal Memory > > - Inner/Outer Write-Back Cacheable > > - memory attribute. */ > > +#define XENMAPSPACE_shared_info 0 > > +#define XENMAPSPACE_grant_table 1 > > +#define XENMAPSPACE_gmfn 2 > > +#define XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range 3 > > +#define XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign 4 > > +#define XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio 5 > > /* ` } */ > > ... this also something that wants converting? For clarity, I take you are talking about these two enum-related comments: /* ` enum phys_map_space { */ [... various #defines ... ] /* ` } */ Is this something we want to convert to kernel-doc? I don't know. I couldn't see an obvious value in doing it, in the sense that it doesn't necessarely make things clearer. I took a second look at the header and the following would work: /** * DOC: Source mapping space. * * enum phys_map_space { * * - XENMAPSPACE_shared_info: shared info page * - XENMAPSPACE_grant_table: grant table page * - XENMAPSPACE_gmfn: GMFN * - XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range: GMFN range, XENMEM_add_to_physmap only. * - XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign: GMFN from another dom, * XENMEM_add_to_physmap_batch only. * - XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio: device mmio region ARM only; the region is mapped * in Stage-2 using the Normal MemoryInner/Outer * Write-Back Cacheable memory attribute. * } */ Note the blank line after "enum phys_map_space {" is required. All in all I am in favor of *not* converting the enum comment to kernel-doc, but I'd be OK with it anyway.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |