[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH V1 05/12] hvm/dm: Introduce xendevicemodel_set_irq_level DM op
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Oleksandr <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:12:24 +0300
- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 22:13:00 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 05.08.20 19:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hi, Jan
On 03.08.2020 20:21, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
--- a/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h
@@ -417,6 +417,20 @@ struct xen_dm_op_pin_memory_cacheattr {
uint32_t pad;
};
+/*
+ * XEN_DMOP_set_irq_level: Set the logical level of a one of a domain's
+ * IRQ lines.
+ * XXX Handle PPIs.
+ */
+#define XEN_DMOP_set_irq_level 19
+
+struct xen_dm_op_set_irq_level {
+ uint32_t irq;
+ /* IN - Level: 0 -> deasserted, 1 -> asserted */
+ uint8_t level;
+};
If this is the way to go (I've seen other discussion going on),
please make sure you add explicit padding fields and ...
ok
+
+
struct xen_dm_op {
... you don't add double blank lines.
ok
--
Regards,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko
|
