[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Golang design session follow-up
Hello, Here are the notes from the golang bindings design session at Xen Summit earlier this month: Possible improvements: - Expanding the IDL to have information about device add / remove functions Ian: It's important that the IDL generates the C prototypes as well. We could generate some man pages as well. "AO" functions need to be a separate thing, not just listed as arguments. How to distinguish between "easy to wrap" things vs "this is internal infrastructure" Idea: "Classes" in IDL: "Device add/remove function", &c Rust: Probably want two versions of the bindings; sync and async. Same thing for python. # Notification of events We don't want a golang wrapper for the sigchld callback Helper function to "do the domain shutdown thing" # Long-term home of the package Ian: Autogenerated stuff is becoming more annoying. Delete all the libxl auto-generated stuff from staging & master, and have "output branch". The reason we have these in-tree is that otherwise you can't build *from git* if you don't have new enough versions of the right tools. Distribution: Make a repo on xenbits! Our main focus for "improvements" was on expanding the libxl IDL to support function prototypes so that wrappers could be easily generated. I volunteered to work on this front, and have started some patches that I will send in an RFC state soon (likely after 4.14 is released). On "notification of events", I think we were just discussing what needs to be done for the xenlight package to support domain destruction/reaping. This is also something I will work on. Finally, we came to the decision that the golang bindings should be pushed to their own repo and tagged independently of xen.git. I think tasks still need to be divvied up for this one. If I missed anything important or made any mistakes, please let me know. Thanks, NR
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |