[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: RFC: PCI devices passthrough on Arm design proposal
> On 17 Jul 2020, at 15:29, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 17/07/2020 14:22, Bertrand Marquis wrote: >>>> # Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl: >>>> >>>> Libxl is creating a virtual PCI device tree node in the device tree >>>> to enable the guest OS to discover the virtual PCI during guest >>>> boot. We introduced the new config option [vpci="pci_ecam"] for >>>> guests. When this config option is enabled in a guest configuration, >>>> a PCI device tree node will be created in the guest device tree. >>>> >>>> A new area has been reserved in the arm guest physical map at which >>>> the VPCI bus is declared in the device tree (reg and ranges >>>> parameters of the node). A trap handler for the PCI ECAM access from >>>> guest has been registered at the defined address and redirects >>>> requests to the VPCI driver in Xen. >>> >>> Can't you deduce the requirement of such DT node based on the presence >>> of a 'pci=' option in the same config file? >>> >>> Also I wouldn't discard that in the future you might want to use >>> different emulators for different devices, so it might be helpful to >>> introduce something like: >>> >>> pci = [ '08:00.0,backend=vpci', '09:00.0,backend=xenpt', >>> '0a:00.0,backend=qemu', ... ] > > I like this idea :). > >>> >>> For the time being Arm will require backend=vpci for all the passed >>> through devices, but I wouldn't rule out this changing in the future. >> We need it for the case where no device is declared in the config file and >> the user >> wants to add devices using xl later. In this case we must have the DT node >> for it >> to work. > > Are you suggesting that you plan to implement PCI hotplug? No this is not in the current plan but we should not prevent this to be supported some day :-) Bertrand > > Cheers, > > -- > Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |