[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [EXTERNAL] [Xen-devel] XEN Qdisk Ceph rbd support broken?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Marcotte <marcotte@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 15 July 2020 20:17 > To: Durrant, Paul <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jules <jules@xxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > oleksandr_grytsov@xxxxxxxx; wl@xxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Xen-devel] XEN Qdisk Ceph rbd support broken? > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open > attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > This issue with Xen 4.13 and Ceph/RBD was last discussed back in February. > > > Remote network Ceph image works fine with Xen 4.12.x ... > > > > In Xen 4.13.0 which I have tested recently it blames with the error > > message "no such file or directory" as it would try accessing the image > > over filesystem instead of remote network image. > > --- > > > > I doubt the issue is in xl/libxl; sounds more likely to be in QEMU. The > > PV block backend infrastructure in QEMU was changed between the 4.12 > > and 4.13 releases. Have you tried using an older QEMU with 4.13? > > I'm also encountering the problem: > > failed to create drive: Could not open 'rbd:rbd/machine.disk0': No such > file or directory > > Xenstore has "params" like this: > > aio:rbd:rbd/machine.disk0 > > If I set it to "rbd:rbd/machine.disk0", I get a different message: > > failed to create drive: Parameter 'pool' is missing > > Using upstream QEMU versions 2 or 3 works fine. > > The interesting thing is that access by the virtual BIOS works fine. So, > for a PVHVM domain, GRUB loads which loads a kernel, but the kernel can't > access the disks. Brian, That's not entirely surprising as the BIOS is likely to be using an emulated device rather than a PV interface. Your issue stems from the auto-creation code in xen-block: https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=hw/block/xen-block.c;hb=HEAD#l723 The "aio:rbd:rbd/machine.disk0" string is generated by libxl and does look a little odd and will fool the parser there, but the error you see after modifying the string appears to be because QEMU's QMP block device instantiation code is objecting to a missing parameter. Older QEMUs circumvented that code which is almost certainly why you don't see the issue with versions 2 or 3. Paul > > -- > - Brian
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |