Re: [PATCH v4 for-4.14 2/2] pvcalls: Document correctly and explicitely the padding for all arches

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 29.06.2020 12:03, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 29/06/2020 09:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 27.06.2020 11:55, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> As an aside, the padding sadly cannot be mandated to be 0 as they are
>>> already present. So it is not going to be possible to use the padding
>>> for extending a command in the future.
>>
>> Why is the other adjustment fine to make due to still being tech
>> preview, but this one wouldn't be for the same reason?
> 
> This is mostly a left-over of the previous message. Although, I am not 
> really inclined to address this myself any time soon.

Sure, I didn't mean to indicate I might expect you to. But perhaps
here the wording could be slightly changed as well?

Jan