[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen/privcmd: Convert get_user_pages*() to pin_user_pages*()
On 2020-06-24 20:02, Souptick Joarder wrote: In 2019, we introduced pin_user_pages*() and now we are converting get_user_pages*() to the new API as appropriate. [1] & [2] could be referred for more information. This is case 5 as per document [1]. [1] Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst [2] "Explicit pinning of user-space pages": https://lwn.net/Articles/807108/ Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi, I'm compile tested this, but unable to run-time test, so any testing help is much appriciated. drivers/xen/privcmd.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c index 0da417c..eb05254 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c +++ b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static int lock_pages( if (requested > nr_pages) return -ENOSPC;- page_count = get_user_pages_fast(+ page_count = pin_user_pages_fast( (unsigned long) kbufs[i].uptr, requested, FOLL_WRITE, pages); if (page_count < 0) { @@ -612,13 +612,7 @@ static int lock_pages(static void unlock_pages(struct page *pages[], unsigned int nr_pages){ - unsigned int i; - - for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) { - if (!PageDirty(page)) - set_page_dirty_lock(page); - put_page(pages[i]); - } + unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(pages, nr_pages, 1); "true", not "1", is the correct way to call that function. Also, this approach changes the behavior slightly, but I think it's reasonable to just set_page_dirty_lock() on the whole range--hard to see much benefit in checking PageDirty first. }static long privcmd_ioctl_dm_op(struct file *file, void __user *udata) thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |