[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Keystone Issue
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:05 AM CodeWiz2280 <codewiz2280@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 8:47 AM Bertrand Marquis > <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 5 Jun 2020, at 13:42, CodeWiz2280 <codewiz2280@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 8:30 AM Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> On 05/06/2020 13:25, CodeWiz2280 wrote: > > >>> The Keystone uses the netcp driver, which has interrupts from 40-79 > > >>> listed in the device tree (arch/arm/boot/keystone-k2e-netcp.dtsi). > > >>> I'm using the same device tree between my non-xen standalone kernel > > >>> and my dom0 kernel booted by xen. In the standalone (non-xen) kernel > > >>> the ethernet works fine, but I don't see any of its interrupts in the > > >>> output of /proc/iomem. I'm not seeing them in /proc/iomem when > > >>> running dom0 under Xen either. When booting with Xen I get this > > >>> behavior where the ifconfig output shows 1 RX message and 1 TX > > >>> message, and then nothing else. > > >> > > >> I am not sure whether this is a typo in the e-mail. /proc/iomem is > > >> listing the list of the MMIO regions. You want to use /proc/interrupts. > > >> > > >> Can you confirm which path you are dumping? > > > Yes, that was a typo. Sorry about that. I meant that I am dumping > > > /proc/interrupts and do not > > > see them under the non-xen kernel or xen booted dom0. > > > > Could you post both /proc/interrupts content ? > > Standalone non-xen kernel (Ethernet works) > # cat /proc/interrupts > CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 > 17: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 29 Level > arch_timer > 18: 9856 1202 457 650 GICv2 30 Level > arch_timer > 21: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 142 Edge > timer-keystone > 22: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 52 Edge > arm-pmu > 23: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 53 Edge > arm-pmu > 24: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 54 Edge > arm-pmu > 25: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 55 Edge > arm-pmu > 26: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 36 Edge > 26202a0.keystone_irq > 27: 1435 0 0 0 GICv2 309 Edge ttyS0 > 29: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 315 Edge > 2530000.i2c > 30: 1 0 0 0 GICv2 318 Edge > 2530400.i2c > 31: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 321 Edge > 2530800.i2c > 32: 69 0 0 0 GICv2 324 Edge > 21000400.spi > 33: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 328 Edge > 21000600.spi > 34: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 332 Edge > 21000800.spi > 70: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 417 Edge > ks-pcie-error-irq > 79: 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI 0 Edge > PCIe PME, aerdrv > 88: 57 0 0 0 GICv2 80 Level > hwqueue-528 > 89: 57 0 0 0 GICv2 81 Level > hwqueue-529 > 90: 47 0 0 0 GICv2 82 Level > hwqueue-530 > 91: 41 0 0 0 GICv2 83 Level > hwqueue-531 > IPI0: 0 0 0 0 CPU wakeup interrupts > IPI1: 0 0 0 0 Timer broadcast interrupts > IPI2: 730 988 1058 937 Rescheduling interrupts > IPI3: 2 3 4 6 Function call interrupts > IPI4: 0 0 0 0 CPU stop interrupts > IPI5: 0 0 0 0 IRQ work interrupts > IPI6: 0 0 0 0 completion interrupts > > Xen dom0 (Ethernet stops) > # cat /proc/interrupts > CPU0 > 18: 10380 GIC-0 27 Level arch_timer > 19: 0 GIC-0 142 Edge timer-keystone > 20: 88 GIC-0 16 Level events > 21: 0 xen-dyn Edge -event xenbus > 22: 0 GIC-0 36 Edge 26202a0.keystone_irq > 23: 1 GIC-0 312 Edge ttyS0 > 25: 1 GIC-0 318 Edge > 27: 1 GIC-0 324 Edge 21000400.spi > 28: 0 GIC-0 328 Edge 21000600.spi > 29: 0 GIC-0 332 Edge 21000800.spi > 65: 0 GIC-0 417 Edge ks-pcie-error-irq > 74: 0 PCI-MSI 0 Edge PCIe PME, aerdrv > 83: 1 GIC-0 80 Level hwqueue-528 > 84: 1 GIC-0 81 Level hwqueue-529 > 85: 1 GIC-0 82 Level hwqueue-530 > 86: 1 GIC-0 83 Level hwqueue-531 > 115: 87 xen-dyn Edge -virq hvc_console > IPI0: 0 CPU wakeup interrupts > IPI1: 0 Timer broadcast interrupts > IPI2: 0 Rescheduling interrupts > IPI3: 0 Function call interrupts > IPI4: 0 CPU stop interrupts > IPI5: 0 IRQ work interrupts > IPI6: 0 completion interrupts > Err: 0 After getting a chance to look at this a little more, I believe the TX/RX interrupts for the ethernets map like this: eth0 Rx - hwqueue-528 eth1 Rx - hwqueue-529 eth0 Tx - hwqueue-530 eth1 Tx - hwqueue-531 > The interrupt counts in the standlone working kernel seem to roughly correspond to the counts of Tx/Rx messages in ifconfig. Going on that, its clear that only 1 interrupt has been received for Tx and 1 for Rx in the Xen Dom0 equivalent. Any thoughts on this? > > > > Cheers > > Bertrand > >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |