Re: [PATCH 7/8] hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm: Use the IEC binary prefix definitions

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 6/1/20 10:33 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/1/20 9:26 AM, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@xxxxxxxxx> On Behalf 
>>> Of Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>>> Sent: 31 May 2020 18:38
>>> To: qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>; Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx>; Peter 
>>> Maydell
>>> <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx>; Richard Henderson <rth@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Eduardo 
>>> Habkost
>>> <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>; Hervé Poussineau 
>>> <hpoussin@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Marcel
>>> Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@xxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
>>> Paolo Bonzini
>>> <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>; Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; Cédric 
>>> Le Goater <clg@xxxxxxxx>;
>>> qemu-trivial@xxxxxxxxxx; Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>; 
>>> qemu-arm@xxxxxxxxxx; Michael S. Tsirkin
>>> <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>; Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
>>> qemu-ppc@xxxxxxxxxx; Philippe Mathieu-
>>> Daudé <f4bug@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: [PATCH 7/8] hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm: Use the IEC binary prefix 
>>> definitions
>>>
>>> IEC binary prefixes ease code review: the unit is explicit.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c | 3 ++-
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c b/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
>>> index 82ece6b9e7..679d74e6a3 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
>>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>>   */
>>>
>>>  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>>> +#include "qemu/units.h"
>>>
>>>  #include "cpu.h"
>>>  #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
>>> @@ -230,7 +231,7 @@ static void xen_ram_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
>>>           * Xen does not allocate the memory continuously, it keeps a
>>>           * hole of the size computed above or passed in.
>>>           */
>>> -        block_len = (1ULL << 32) + x86ms->above_4g_mem_size;
>>> +        block_len = 4 * GiB + x86ms->above_4g_mem_size;
>>
>> Not strictly necessary but could we retain the brackets please?
> 
> Sure.
> 
> Laurent, if this can go via your trivial@ tree, can you do the change or
> you rather I resend the whole series?

I understood reading another thread that contributor should not overload
maintainer, so I'll simply repost this as v2.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-06/msg00066.html

> 
>>
>>   Paul
>>
>>>      }
>>>      memory_region_init_ram(&ram_memory, NULL, "xen.ram", block_len,
>>>                             &error_fatal);
>>> --
>>> 2.21.3
>>
>>
>>
>