|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] x86/build32: Discard all orphaned sections
On 13.05.2020 17:00, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 13/05/2020 10:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> [CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT reply, click links, or open attachments
>> unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>> On 12.05.2020 21:11, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> @@ -47,6 +47,14 @@ SECTIONS
>>> *
>>> * Please check build32.mk for more details.
>>> */
>>> - /* *(.got.plt) */
>>> + *(.got.plt)
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /DISCARD/ : {
>>> + /*
>>> + * Discard everything else, to prevent linkers from putting
>>> + * orphaned sections ahead of .text, which needs to be first.
>>> + */
>>> + *(*)
>>> }
>>> }
>> To be honest I'm not sure if this isn't going too far. Much
>> depends on what would happen if a new real section appeared
>> that needs retaining.
>
> Anything which is important enough will result in a linker error.
>
>> Granted the linker may then once again
>> put it at the beginning of the image, and we'll be screwed
>> again, just like we'll be screwed if a section gets discarded
>> by mistake.
>
> This way is more likely to result in a build failure than an inability
> to boot the resulting build of Xen.
>
>> But it would be really nice if we had a way to
>> flag the need to play with the linker script. Hence perhaps
>> on new enough tool chains we indeed may want to make use of
>> --orphan-handling= ? And then discard just .note and .note.*
>> here?
>
> The only valid option would be =error, but experimenting with that yields
>
> ld: error: unplaced orphan section `.comment' from `cmdline.o'
> ld: error: unplaced orphan section `.note.GNU-stack' from `cmdline.o'
> ld: error: unplaced orphan section `.note.gnu.property' from `cmdline.o'
> ld: error: unplaced orphan section `.rel.got' from `cmdline.o'
> ld: error: unplaced orphan section `.got' from `cmdline.o'
> ld: error: unplaced orphan section `.got.plt' from `cmdline.o'
> ld: error: unplaced orphan section `.iplt' from `cmdline.o'
> ld: error: unplaced orphan section `.rel.iplt' from `cmdline.o'
> ld: error: unplaced orphan section `.igot.plt' from `cmdline.o'
>
> which I think is going to get us massively bogged down in toolchain
> specifics. I'm not entirely convinced this would be a good move.
That's ugly indeed; especially the .rel.* sections are worrying to
appear there. Hence patch as is
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |